Destroying the anti-embargo arguments | Babalú Blog

Humberto Fontova: I was really, REALLY hoping Roberto Martin-Perez and some of the others who suffered the longest...
Carolinasympatica: My father, who was the director of CBS News, who left in 1952, indicated to me, as we would watch...
Carolinasympatica: So a little side note to this story is that Coral Capital also had an ex Canadian Ambassador to...
asombra: I used to look just like William, but now I’m more vascular.
asombra: But of course, Cronkite “meant well,” and that’s all that matters. He must have had a...
asombra: Sorry, I meant the above for the internet cable post.
asombra: Is that like the revolution that only brought regression?

Destroying the anti-embargo arguments

By Henry Louis Gomez, on March 12, 2009, at 6:40 pm

In thirty minutes. Hear my interview on Radio for Conservatives by clicking here.

1 comment to Destroying the anti-embargo arguments

Luis Gonzalez

March 12th, 2009 at 11:07 PM

Henry...good job.

You hit the nail on the head when you spoke about assigning a false purpose or goal to the "embargo."

Here's my take on one way that the Cuban "embargo" has been wildly successful: the US is one of a handful of nations in the world that Cuba didn't stick with millions (or billions) or dollars worth of unpaid bills.

You and I both understand that the US lifting trade restrictions against Cuba, will not elicit equal changes from the Castro brothers.

They will change nothing, and what will end up happening will be an unholy union of amoral American industries, and the Cuban government's treatment of the nation's workforce as property of the "revolution."

Without unilateral changes, lifting trade restrictions will serve to further enslave the people of Cuba.