PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • theCardinal: This is more disappointing than you can imagine. In PoliSci circles you can’t get much bigger than Allison. His...

  • asombra: Bottom line: Blaming the US is always safe–and so convenient, too.

  • asombra: Allison’s face looks like a flaccid whoopee cushion. Imagine that.

  • asombra: A tip: Take the whole Cuba situation as an elaborate joke. Treat it as such. Voilà! It all makes sense–especially...

  • asombra: Humberto, you ignorant peasant. How dare you question your betters? Just because these people are hopelessly clueless (at best)...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

It’s good to be the King (Part 235)

Do as I say, not as I do.

Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies.

But apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel: At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress.

The Air Force had asked for one Gulfstream 550 jet price tag: about $65 million as part of an ongoing upgrade of its passenger air service.

But the House Appropriations Committee, at its own initiative, added to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill another $132 million for two more airplanes and specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials.

Because the Appropriations Committee viewed the additional aircraft as an expansion of an existing Defense Department program, it did not treat the money for two more planes as an earmark, and the legislation does not disclose which Member had requested the additional money.

Comments are closed.