PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?




activism


ozt_bilingual



buclbanner

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

recommended reading






recent comments


  • Rayarena: There’s a blitzkrieg of Cuban tourism propaganda going on at the moment. You can always tell when the...

  • Ziva Sahl: Because the unkempt greasy looking mass murderer is just too sexy! There a sickness out there… why...

  • Ziva Sahl: Somehow the outrage never extends to Cubans, you know, those smiling happy dancing making music natives...

  • Carlos Eire: I bow to THE master, “el cirujano”, top stealth ninja counter-misinformation warrior in the...

  • George Moneo: Heh heh heh. Eire and Fontova revolviendo the you-know-what on this blog! It don’t get better...

  • Humberto Fontova: Oye pero la verdad que este Carlos Eire es TREMENDO jodedor! Engangandonos con el titulo y las pics...

  • FreedomForCuba: joe, I know you understand the MSM agenda but what I do not understand how you can vouch for John Q....

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

visitor map


Creative Commons License

It’s good to be the King (Part 235)

Do as I say, not as I do.

Last year, lawmakers excoriated the CEOs of the Big Three automakers for traveling to Washington, D.C., by private jet to attend a hearing about a possible bailout of their companies.

But apparently Congress is not philosophically averse to private air travel: At the end of July, the House approved nearly $200 million for the Air Force to buy three elite Gulfstream jets for ferrying top government officials and Members of Congress.

The Air Force had asked for one Gulfstream 550 jet price tag: about $65 million as part of an ongoing upgrade of its passenger air service.

But the House Appropriations Committee, at its own initiative, added to the 2010 Defense appropriations bill another $132 million for two more airplanes and specified that they be assigned to the D.C.-area units that carry Members of Congress, military brass and top government officials.

Because the Appropriations Committee viewed the additional aircraft as an expansion of an existing Defense Department program, it did not treat the money for two more planes as an earmark, and the legislation does not disclose which Member had requested the additional money.

Comments are closed.