PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?




activism


ozt_bilingual



buclbanner

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

recommended reading






recent comments


  • antonio2009: Sean Penn is such an erudite intellectual, just like his former wife Madonna.

  • Humberto Fontova: Cuba Experts–INDEED!…an d the entire proceedings were utterly and gloriously free of...

  • asombra: The Brits who set him free are disgusting operators.

  • asombra: Mariela turns 52 this year. Considering she’s had every advantage her entire life, she’s not holding up too...

  • asombra: The AP doesn’t care, since biased agenda-pushing thinly disguised as journalism is the norm, but every time...

  • asombra: Yes, Antonio, that’s pretty much what I understood, which would obviously suggest that Müller is damaged or...

  • Humberto Fontova: “If indeed U.S. policy is deemed as one case of failure to change the nature of the Cuban...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

visitor map


Creative Commons License

Is it time to lift the U.S. embargo against Cuba?

Viewers and readers in the United States are overwhelmed with repeated arguments for why the time has come to lift the U.S. embargo that President John F. Kennedy imposed on Cuba in 1962.

Who is right and who is wrong? That’s the question – to bring Shakespeare into this polemic.

I find it amusing that some Cuban Americans, from both conservative and liberal leanings, argue that it is time to lift the U.S. embargo. Their logic being that after 49 years of embargo, Cuba retains a totalitarian government. I understand the logic of this argument all too well. Its genesis is the feeling that they are tired of waiting for a democratic change to occur in Cuba. However, my magnanimity does not extend to an acknowledgement of the rightness of their argument.

I believe that the argument posited by these Cuban Americans is wrong. The United States ran out of easy solutions to restore democracy to Cuba when it botched up the Bay of Pigs Invasion in April of 1961. This was the initiative designed to topple the Castro regime. We are clear on the true motives of this undertaking. However, let’s be clear that the reason for imposing the trade embargo on Cuba has never been to bring about a regime change in the Caribbean island. The reason for the embargo was to punish the Cuban Government for appropriating (stealing, in plain English) all U.S. properties in Cuba without offering a cent to compensate their rightful owners.

Cuban officials have made repeated statements in the past about the ineffectiveness of the U.S. embargo, and about how it’s not worth it to spend a second discussing it. This, of course, is all bluffing on their part – depending on the audience that they are trying to manipulate. So, when they are talking to the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) delegates, Cuban officials brag about how the Cuban Revolution has survived the constant aggression to their homeland by the U.S. embargo. They resort to all kinds of silly slogans that have failed to resonate with average Cubans a long time ago, like “Patria o Muerte, Venceremos!” (Country or Death, we will prevail in the end!”). Naturally, these CBC delegates walk away highly impressed with their Cuban hosts, and take back their propaganda to the chambers of the U.S. Congress. Subsequently, the Cuban officials pat themselves on the back for having done their job, and splurge with fancy dinners at restaurants that average Cubans lack access to.

But, then, these same Cuban officials make totally different arguments when trying to influence different audiences. This was the case when Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez delivered a speech on September 27, 2011, at the United Nations General Assembly by stating that the cruel and inhumane U.S. embargo had cost Cuba $975 billion. In other words, Rodriguez was lobbying the world community to put pressure on President Obama to lift it. Thus, the embargo has been highly effective in punishing the Cuban Government for its Mafioso-like demeanor against American business owners.

Even more important to Americans, the U.S. embargo has been highly effective in preventing the Cuban authorities to use the $975 billion to bankroll terrorist groups from attacking the U.S. There is plenty of evidence showing the Cuban Government’s intentions to harm the United States. For example, the State Department included Cuba on the 2010 list of state sponsors of terrorism. As recently as 2009, Water K. Myers and his wife were arrested and charged with conspiracy to act as illegal agents of the Cuban Government and conspiracy to communicate classified information to Havana. Up to 20 Cuban intelligence agents and collaborators walked to U.S. embassies around the world in the six months after the 9/11 attacks and offered fabricated information on terrorism threats – which distracted U.S. law enforcement officials from pursuing legitimate leads and putting Americans in harm’s way. Ten days after 9/11, U.S. authorities arrested the Pentagon's top Cuba analyst, Ana Belen Montes, on charges of spying for Havana. Let’s not forget that Fidel Castro, while visiting Iran in May 2001, proudly proclaimed – just four months before 9-11 – that “Iran and Cuba, in cooperation with each other, can bring America to its knees.” And who can forget the trial and conviction in federal courts of the infamous Cuban Five, who were convicted in Miami of conspiracy to commit espionage, conspiracy to commit murder, and other illegal activities in the United States.

Thus, the U.S. embargo has kept American safe from terrorist acts. This threat is real. Measured by this standard, the U.S. embargo has been an overwhelming success. I do believe, however, that the thing that should be lifted is not the U.S. embargo – but the smoke screen that Cuban officials have spread around the world. The U.S embargo is not responsible for the hardships that Cubans are suffering on a daily basis. It is the imposition of a failed economic system that is responsible for their suffering.

5 comments to Is it time to lift the U.S. embargo against Cuba?

  • Bravo, Jorge, you express the arguments very well!

  • Rayarena

    What I find amazing is the amount of time and energy that the mainstream media and academia spend in trying to get the embargo lifted. It's a virtual blitzkrieg that would make Goebbels blush.

    I don't know why this happens? Is the Cuban regime's propaganda mill so powerful that this impoverished wreck of what once a republic able to wrap the powerful US media around its little finger?

    Or is the US media willingly chilling for the regime because its sympathizes with castro? Could it be that the tyranny has well-placed moles in the media and academia, moles that are able to shape American public opinion towards Cuba?

    Or is it that the MSM has an inherent antipathy towards castro's adversaries, the exile community, because:

    A] We are mostly Republican
    B]We don't identify as "brown lateenos" but rather as white descendants of Europeans
    C] We don't ask for handouts, are not lost in victimhood and are self-suficient

    I don't know, I think that its a bit of all of the above.

  • Jorge Ponce

    Rayarena, I can answer your “why” question. It comes down to human frailty of having grandiose visions of oneself. It comes down to dealing with members of the “Me-First” society.
    There are too many people walking around at all levels of society who have a much higher opinion of their talents than their peers recognize. If they are architects, they think that they are the next I.M. Pei. If they are literary authors, they think that they are more talented than Mario Vargas Llosa. If they are in front of a masterpiece like Salvador Dalí’s “Last Supper,” they claim that “a mí nunca me dio por pintar,” (I never took up painting).
    Rather than coming to grips with their mediocrity and doing something proactive about it – like going back to school or getting another degree – they blame those around them for their misery. Thus, their peers, their supervisors, their politicians, the infidels, America become the targets of their insanity and feelings of inferiority.
    What this dysfunctional gang looks for is fame, recognition, research funding, wild sex, or an independently-wealthy status. Their anger is amplified by the length of time that their sought-after needs have been denied.
    When some of these characters come across Cuban officials who are proficient in Freudian theories, you get a perfect match made in hell. The Cubans apparatchiks know that by providing just a bit of what these individuals have spent a life in search of, they can manipulate them to espouse and propagate the views of the Cuban Government. Thus, you find journalists, reporters, bureaucrats, university professors, scientists, and politicians advocating for the lifting of the U.S. embargo “by all means necessary” – to quote Malcolm X – without thinking or caring for what’s good for their own country or fellow citizens.
    These individuals think that John F. Kennedy belonged in a mental institution after proclaiming at his inaugural address, “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.” To this gang, they are the center of the universe!

  • asombra

    The left largely controls the media, academia, the entertainment industry, the arts, the presumed intellectual class and the fashionable political establishment. It wants and expects minorities as clients and/or tools. Its obvious "problem" with Cuban-Americans is due to political/ideological antipathy as well as resentment of our success on OUR terms, as non-victims and non-dependents. We won't allow them to feel condescendingly or patronizingly superior because we don't buy their BS or dance to their tune. They HATE that, and they're determined to slap us down and put us in our place, meaning the place they want for us. It's all quite clear and, in a sense, quite logical, or certainly to be expected. We just have to do our own thing, go our own way, stand our ground, and be ever vigilant not to fall into the left's favorite trap: the fashion-victim trap.