PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?




activism


ozt_bilingual



buclbanner

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

recommended reading






recent comments


  • Honey: When an ill Roosevelt outvoted Churchill and gave in to Stalin at Yalta and returned the Russian prisoners of...

  • Honey: But: These people vote! I am in favor of people who pass literacy tests and taxpayers only voting.

  • asombra: Baquero was black, came from poverty and happened to be homosexual. According to the official, “correct”...

  • asombra: Seriously, it’s sad. She’s supposed to be representing the USA, not Belize. I mean, get a frigging...

  • asombra: Rousseff used to rob banks and was the “brain” of a terrorist group. What’s the surprise?

  • George Moneo: AS always, fuzzy, you’re right. Henceforth the first four notes of Beethoven’s Fifth...

  • Fuzzy_Bunny: Lucas wants the ‘final cut’ of his movies to be true to his own vision, now that he has the...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

visitor map


Creative Commons License

The Republican circular firing squad continues apace

I'll be publishing an essay Monday on what I've described in an email thread as "the most fucked-up Republican primary campaign of my lifetime." For the moment, though, go over to American Spectator and read the superb piece by Jeffrey Lord on (one of) the hatchet jobs being done on Newt Gingrich. Here's a taste:

As Ronald Reagan used to say: Well.

Yesterday we took note of former Reagan State Department official Elliott Abrams' piece over at NRO that went after Newt Gingrich on his relationship with Reagan. While voting regularly with Reagan as a young congressman from Georgia, Gingrich, claimed Abrams, "often spewed insulting rhetoric at Reagan, his top aides and his policies to defeat Communism." Abrams then goes on to cite " a famous floor statement Gingrich made on March 21, 1986."

Or sort of cites it.

In fact, I'm sorry to say, what appears to be going on here is that Elliott Abrams, a considerably admirable public servant and a very smart guy, has been swept up in the GOP Establishment's Romney frothings over the rise of Newt Gingrich in the Republican primaries. He is even being accused of trolling for a job in a Romney administration. No way!!!! Really????

What else can possibly explain a piece like the one Abrams penned on a day when Gingrich was being of a mysterious sudden targeted in one hit piece after another for his ties to Reagan? The pieces invariably following the Romney line that Newt had some version of nothing to do with Reagan.

A piece like the one Abrams wrote depends for its success in garnering headlines -- which it did -- by assuming no one will bother to get into the weeds and do the homework. Usually a safe assumption when dealing with the mainstream media, particularly a mainstream media that, as one with Establishment Republicans, hates Newt Gingrich.

Not so fast. [...]

I don't have a dog in this hunt: none of these candidates is my ideal of a conservative Republican in the Reagan mode. That said, however, the sniping, conniving, backstabbing, innuendos and calumnies (from all parties) are beginning to wear thin and piss me off. This is not the campaign I envisioned that was needed to end the Democrats' hopes of reelecting Jimmy Carter II.

(H/T L'il Sis)

4 comments to The Republican circular firing squad continues apace

  • Mr. Mojito

    If the GOP is going to lose to Obama, I would rather go down swinging with Gingrich than with "polite" Romney.

    Obama's billion dollars and MSM in his pocket is starting to look insurmountable, and the last thing the GOP needs to do is put up Romneycare Mitt who will lose "admirably".

  • asombra

    The chief culprit, IMO, is the Republican establishment, which cares more about maintaining the status quo and protecting its personal interests than in doing what needs to be done.

  • asombra

    The chief culprit, IMO, is the Republican establishment, which cares more about maintaining the status quo and protecting its personal interests than in doing what needs to be done.

You must be logged in to post a comment.