PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Gallardo: Rayarena, what the likes of MSN do is serve the Castro propaganda apparatus out of sympathy and for monetary gain. Castro has...

  • Rayarena: Another brilliant dissection by Orlando Luis Pardo Lazo!

  • Rayarena: Asombra, you hit the nail on the head! Elian is no longer useful [poor kid, he's a psychological mess--its obvious even at a...

  • asombra: This is the new Elián, complete with “militant” grandmother; the prior one is no longer cute/young/cuddly enough,...

  • asombra: I think instead of “pest” you meant plague. And yes, it’s surprising that any Hollywood type would get that...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Divide and conquer

A very interesting analysis of the current SCOTUS kerfuffle.

[...] Now, Mr. Obama certainly knows that the words that flowed from his rhetorical lips were completely false. Striking a law of Congress is not unprecedented, and not even particularly extraordinary: The court’s struck down more than 150 federal laws since its inception, not to mention overturning hundreds of state and local laws.

So why on Earth would he say it? Why would he lecture the top jurists in the land — unelected, as they are, and appointed for life to remove them from petty politics — that the law has a “human element” that he hopes is “not forgotten in this political debate”? Why, for Heaven’s sake, would he declare that “the justices should understand” his health-care law doesn’t work unless every American is forced to buy coverage, whether it’s constitutional or not?

Simple. His provably false remarks weren’t aimed at Supreme Court justices, but rather at uninformed Americans, especially liberals (is there any other kind?). The most divisive president in history is setting up yet another straw man for his re-election campaign, one that fits directly into his strategy to divide and conquer.

The campaign geniuses, the same ones who came up with the idea to run against the much-despised Congress (even though Democrats control the Senate), have decided that deriding the Supreme Court as an arm of the Republican Party is a winning plan, one that will resonate across the country come November.

But here, the big brains are horribly mistaken: Mr. Obama maligns the high court at his peril. Americans, especially those in what dual-coast lefties derisively dub “flyover country,” like their Supreme Court. They aren’t about to let a president — any president — bully what many see as the cornerstone of the checks-and-balances system set up by the Founders. [...]

Comments are closed.