PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?




what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading






babalú features





recent comments


  • Humberto Fontova: You’re right!–Che was “Best-man” (“witness?”) at Raul’s wedding with Hilda...

  • asombra: The AP is just being ironic, obviously.

  • asombra: Kerry’s reply: Dear Congresspersons: Really, I’d have thought you’d have wised up by now. This is a DEM...

  • asombra: On the bright side, this solves the Chesimard problem. Have her renounce US citizenship and stay outside the US, and just drop...

  • asombra: Never mind the beer; just make sure paramedics are on standby. I assume a designated minder for Alberto has been selected.

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

don’t miss these


Babalú @ Molina Art Gallery

gen-n-top sidebar ad.jpg

staIBDeditLogo.gif

Crisis management, Dem style

Never let a good crisis go to waste -- unless it makes us lose elections.

[...] The truth is that Democrats want to complain about gun control while avoiding implementation. They recognize that implementation of further gun control measures is politically unpalatable – Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) admitted as much today when she said on Fox News Sunday, “people haven’t rallied [around gun control],” and with the election coming up, “it’s a bad time to embrace a new subject.” This isn’t because Feinstein is a Second Amendment advocate. In fact, she explicitly said that the Holmes shooting wasn’t about “sick, demented individuals,” as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) suggested; rather, said Feinstein, “people use these weapons because they can get them.”

When it comes right down to it, Democrats want to stump for gun control without weathering the political blowback. But when the time is right – after Obama’s possible re-election – they will push for it. And all they’ll need is another horrific event on which to hook their agenda.

And, in the same article, this brilliant comment left by 'JeffWRidge':

The idea that making something illegal will stop criminals from getting those items just shows how far the left is out of whack with reality. It is illegal to get, or manufacture certain drugs, yet the criminals still get and/or make those drugs. It was illegal to make, sell, or transport alcohol during Prohibition, yet the criminals still made, sold and transported alcohol. It is illegal to break into someone's home, yet criminals still break into people's homes. It is illegal to assault or murder people, yet criminals still assault and murder people. The common theme here is that, criminals break the law, so laws don't stop criminals.

We have to face it, lefties are either stupid because they can't figure this basic reality out, or their hatred and fear of guns has driven them insane, or they have another agenda for wanting gun control. Why would anyone want to disarm the populace of a nation? I wonder...

Comments are closed.