NBC #FAIL
Andrea Mitchell and Brian Williams chose to chew on Clint Eastwood's RNC Convention speech and then kick it to commercials instead of airing much of Sen. Marco Rubio's speech, continuing their network's habit of censoring out the speeches of conservative minority republicans who spoke at the convention...
A high school A/V cable access channel has more professionalism than NBC/MSNBC.
The libs are scared, this IS NOT 2008 and Clint stung them with his skit.
Expect tons of venom from the MSM directed at Clint for weeks to come.
Expect the Obama campaign, the Democrats and the MSM to get dirtier and nastier from this point, we have not seen anything yet.
Buckle the seat belts because is going get very nasty...
Mitchell look worse every time I see her (and trust me, I do my best to avoid that).
I continue my MSNBC coverage. Last night I decided again to try to see what it is like to be a liberal.
So I taped the convention on C-Span and mostly watched MSNBC's coverage last night.
Just as what is described in this post, they only allowed the viewers to see, I think three speakers. They even talked over the end prayer.
After all, what Al Sharpton, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and the rest of them have to say is much more important than real history. Because it isn't what is going on in the convention that matters. It is what they tell us is going on, which they couldn't possibly have a clue about because instead of watching it, they are talking over it. One speaker was a black woman, a liberal, who worked for Romney in Mass. They cut to her speech to see if she would tell about Romney's "terrible record as governor on job creation". They assumed that's what she would talk about. Then when she didn't, they expressed how strange it was that someone like her who should know the truth did not mention this. The woman was glowing in her praise of Romney as a boss, a person, and a governor. They didn't bother to notice. This is what passes as news coverage for these ridiculous people.
They have Barak Obama as their candidate. He has a record. Yet they have the audacity to tell us that we must be pretty desperate to have settled on Romney. Now their argument, I admit is not a bad one. In the past Romney did sound like a left winger and he is sounding much more to the right. If he turns out to revert to earlier positions when he governs, and I have no doubt he IS going to win and win big, I will be as angry with Romney as they are dismayed that we settled on him.
That said, they have no shame. Their selective indignation, surprise, the fact that they do not feel any need to explain why they remain loyal to this failure of a president whom they support and lie for is amazing.
Eastwood who was so original and goofy in his wonderful presentation, they never watched. But they had a comment on it, you bet. The all knowing panel asked viewers to be kind; Eastwood was obviously a mistake to have there. He was incoherent and rambling. But he is 82 so cut him some slack, they said.
Rachel declared that McCain will have his work cut out for him as an establishment Republican as he fights the neocons of his party. Neocons? Where did that come from?
Btw why not one mention of the Tea Party at this entire convention. Where were they? Do they exist anymore? Are Tea Partiers to be sidelined?
The bottom line, no wonder libs believe the way they do. If this is the crap they watch or read all the time, instead of what actually happened or was said, of course they are going to have a skewed idea. These so called experts tell them what to think of things the experts didn't bother to take in.
So today I settled in to watch the whole convention and see for myself how it compared to their descriptions of what went on. I had taped from 7:15 to 11:30. WOW. Everyone was great. It was planned well. I cried real tears as the people told about their friend, neighbor and pastor, Mitt Romney and how he did so many helpful and kind things for them. Then each speaker gave a different aspect of the reason he is a competent and smart person. Eastwood was fabulous, original, goofy and adorable.
Eastwood, Rubio and then the man himself. After Ryan's excellent speech I wondered if Mitt could best him. Not to worry. Romney said all that I wanted to hear (except no tea Party mention and I would have liked more about tax cuts and growth). If he does what he says they will do, he could be like Reagan.
Israel, Cuba, strong military, know our enemies, treat out friends well, overturn Obamacare, America's greatness and singularity and prominence in the world. He was great.
And those families of theirs!
So I say to MSNBC and the rest of the non listener propagandists for Obama - eat your hearts out. My side is going to take it all in November. If we do not, it will be because the other side did something illegal and stole it.
Nicely done, Honey.
"Mitchell look worse...." well....that's because her face just reflects what's on the inside. It's amazing they still have her on in the age of HD.
Besides, she can't stop the calendar from moving forward.
It's me or does Michell and Pelosi bear a familiar resemblance?
Man, Mitchell looks nasty. It's like an old Tori Spelling after a bad facelift.