PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Honey: And again, let us not forget that Tauck Tours, the most luxurious tours around, used as the promo for their “people to...

  • Carlos Eire: Yes, Rayarena….I agree with what you say about our “wrongness” in the eyes of those who like to look down...

  • Rayarena: Prof. Eire, those hideous pictures of that Aunt Jemima with the cigar and what happened to you vis-a-vis the cover of your book...

  • Rayarena: Prof. Eire, those hideous pictures of that Aunt Jemima with the cigar and what happened to you vis-a-vis the cover of your book...

  • asombra: While one may certainly wish those who run the Virgin of Charity shrine in Miami had refused to allow Obama to defile it with...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Hope and… chains?

DOJ recommends the slammer for Obama "Hope" artist:

Federal prosecutors want Shepard Fairey, the artist who created the Barack Obama “Hope” poster, to serve time in prison following his misdemeanor conviction for destroying and fabricating documents in connection with a civil lawsuit over the iconic campaign image.

In advance of Friday’s scheduled sentencing of Fairey in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the Department of Justice has filed a memorandum arguing that a prison term for the 42-year-old artist would be “appropriate.”

However, prosecutors did not specify how long Fairey should be incarcerated (though, statutorily, his punishment would not exceed six months). Additionally, government lawyers have contended that Judge Frank Maas could fine Fairey up to $3.2 million.

“A sentence without any term of imprisonment sends a terrible message to those who might commit the same sort of criminal conduct,” wrote prosecutor Daniel Levy in a September 2 memo. “Encouraging parties to game the civil litigation system…creates terrible incentives and subverts the truth-finding function of civil litigation.” [...]

Comments are closed.