PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Humberto Fontova: Indeed, Asombra…Flake just: Creeps. Me. Out. “Slime” hardly does justice to him. Leahy, on the other...

  • asombra: If I had to choose between kicking Leahy or Flake out of politics forever, I think I’d dump Flake. Leahy is a total SOB,...

  • asombra: Morrissey doesn’t quite get it. Of course this situation is deeply humiliating–for the US, but that’s NOT a...

  • asombra: Carlos, it will look good for these assholes ON PAPER. They can throw numbers around and look sharp. Who actually winds up...

  • asombra: And what are “normal” relations with Castro, Inc. worth to the US? NOTHING.

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Hope and… chains?

DOJ recommends the slammer for Obama "Hope" artist:

Federal prosecutors want Shepard Fairey, the artist who created the Barack Obama “Hope” poster, to serve time in prison following his misdemeanor conviction for destroying and fabricating documents in connection with a civil lawsuit over the iconic campaign image.

In advance of Friday’s scheduled sentencing of Fairey in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the Department of Justice has filed a memorandum arguing that a prison term for the 42-year-old artist would be “appropriate.”

However, prosecutors did not specify how long Fairey should be incarcerated (though, statutorily, his punishment would not exceed six months). Additionally, government lawyers have contended that Judge Frank Maas could fine Fairey up to $3.2 million.

“A sentence without any term of imprisonment sends a terrible message to those who might commit the same sort of criminal conduct,” wrote prosecutor Daniel Levy in a September 2 memo. “Encouraging parties to game the civil litigation system…creates terrible incentives and subverts the truth-finding function of civil litigation.” [...]

Comments are closed.