support babalú

Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying






recommended reading

babalú features

recent comments

  • Honey: When Cruz does an interview,. he handles himself very well and he would do just as well in debates. He didn’t win so many...

  • asombra: Alberto, your translation was fine. It’s a matter of nuance which doesn’t really translate. The point is that the...

  • asombra: If Ortega were sharper and more cunning, as opposed to a second-rate and relatively clumsy stooge, he’d feign a sober,...

  • Alberto de la Cruz: Asombra, that was the best translation I could come up with in my quick and dirty translation. If you have a better...

  • asombra: The actual wording he used was “la gusanera de Miami,” which is worse. He doesn’t even have the minimal...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

elsewhere on the net


So then, how did this happen?

Watch this video:

So, at 2:05 Obama says "get the transcript" to apparently no one in particular, except that Crowley just happened to HAVE the transcript.

How did she just "happen" to have that transcript?

7 comments to So then, how did this happen?

  • marc in calgary

    As commented upon on our facebook running commentary...

    "This is the MSM with its finger on the scale"

  • asombra

    Republicans have only themselves to blame for accepting such a moderator. It's not just stupid; it's WEAK.

  • A doctored transcript at that. Outside the nutroots cheering crowd, I don't think this blatent lying is going to help Obama. CNN and Crowley deserve each other.

  • Ziva, I think that there's more than that to it.

    I think it goes deeper.

  • asombra

    I read, which may or may not be true, that when it came to choosing or approving a moderator, each side could veto one candidate for the job, but only one. There was only one conservative in the selected pool, who was naturally vetoed by the Dems, but more than one liberal. All the Republicans could do was veto the worst offender. Sounds plausible enough.

  • Luis, I agree it goes much deeper. We could write a book... but here are a few questions, just on the Libya issue to scratch the surface a little.

    Why did Obama send a possibly gay ambassador to a country where homosexuality is considered offensive and punishable by death, and why on earth, considering the instability of Libya and the approach of 9/11 anniversary did they not provide protection, even after repeated requests?

    Why has the Obama administration marginalized and/or participated in ending regimes in the Middle East friendly to the US and engineered the rise of new anti-American leaders involved with/affiliated with al Quada, and others involved with the terrorist attacks of 9/11?

    What has Obama, the Manchurian Candidate, actually done behind the scenes during the past 3 1/2 years when he's not vacationing or campaigning, because he sure as hell hasn't worked at being President.

    What does the future world Utopia envisioned by international radicals look like after their alliance with radical Islam wins world domination? (Just throwing this one out there to point out the idiocy.)

  • [...] By drillanwr, on October 18, 2012, at 2:48 pm Obama, his administration, the MSM, and Candy Crowley still just cannot seem to come clean on the failure in Benghazi, and the follow-up cover-up that is [...]