PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • asombra: Wait, the guy in the photo looks a little brown to me. Isn’t that supposed to be illegal in Argentina? They’re...

  • asombra: Ah, Mariela. Cue the foreign press! The AP is like one of Pavlov’s dogs.

  • asombra: Any Venezuelan who’s not embarrassed by Maduro deserves him. Same goes for any Cuban not seriously ashamed by Castro, Inc.

  • asombra: Waning? Try over. I mean, look at the woman.

  • asombra: They do it because it works for them and there’s no significant disincentive. They’re obviously NOT concerned with...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Outrageous? You bet!

Maybe someone should bring this up in the debate tonight: "Obama Doctrine: Ft. Hood Was Not Terrorism, Wounded Soldiers Get No Benefits."

Victims of the Nov. 2009 Ft. Hood shooting are being denied benefits commensurate with combat injuries because the Obama administration refuses to label the attack an act of terrorism.

Instead, the shooting Maj. Nidal Hasan carried out after screaming "Allahu Akbar" it is still being labeled "workplace violence."

The difference between labeling the incident "workplace violence" and "terrorism" is not only the rightful recognition 13 of our troops deserve for being killed in service to their country on Nov. 5, 2009, but also ongoing benefits that would help survivors pay for the physical therapy, and other medical and psychological treatments that might be necessary to a full recovery.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has openly stated that the shooting, which took place in his state, was an act of terrorism and that the president such recognize it as such. He said, "President Obama's refusal to call it an act of terror is a shining example of this administration's devotion to political correctness over the defense of our men and women in uniform."

2 comments to Outrageous? You bet!