PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?




what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading






babalú features





recent comments


  • Ziva Sahl: These brave inspiring women deserve so much more than a prize for creative dissent. They deserve the international support of...

  • Humberto Fontova: “And drink OUR beer” sayz da man?!..Pero que tipo mas DESCARA’O, este Alberto!…I plan on...

  • FreedomForCuba: What a complete bullshit act this current POTUS is… He makes me puke with disgust…

  • asombra: Michelle Malkin in a new piece for NRO: Congressional Black Caucus members have stubbornly protested extradition efforts,...

  • asombra: Are those white thingies in her hair sea shells or little skulls?

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

don’t miss these


Babalú @ Molina Art Gallery

gen-n-top sidebar ad.jpg

staIBDeditLogo.gif

The saga continues for Alan Gross in Cuba

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Vb78r3e_f88/ULYr4JE6RHI/AAAAAAABbqM/FL0wUdjODyQ/s400/Collages-001.jpg

Along the Malecon: Alan Gross - Before and After

While American aid worker Alan Gross remains imprisoned in Cuba and held for ransom by the Castro dictatorship, nothing good can really happen. Meanwhile, as Gross' health continues to deteriorate, the Cuban regime is vehemently claiming that he is in fine shape. However, the family's attorney is disputing their claims. You do not have to be a doctor to surmise that based on the before and after photograph above (courtesy of Along the Malecon), it is obvious that Alan Gross' health is being severely and negatively affected by his continued incarceration in a Castro gulag. Naturally, the Cuban dictatorship has an explanation for Gross' anemic and gaunt appearance: they have saved him from obesity with a balanced diet and exercise and he is now at a healthy weight.

Yes, they actually said that.

But Gross' deteriorating health is not the only plot-driver in this drama. His wife Judy, who is suffering unimaginable grief and pain over the injustice being committed against her husband, is struggling between anger and bargaining, two of the five stages of loss and grief. So far, bargaining with the Castro dictatorship has proven futile, as we all unfortunately already knew would be the case. And as is typical in severe cases such as this, Ms. Gross has now turned her anger away from the people who have and continue to hurt her husband, the Castro regime, and directed it towards the United States government and Cuban exiles, placing the blame on them for Alan's predicament. Her anger is undoubtedly and obviously misplaced since it is the Castro dictatorship who arrested her husband and has held him hostage for almost three years, not the U.S. or Cuban exiles. Nonetheless, her anger and misbegotten shift in blame is understandable considering the trauma she, Alan, and their family is experiencing.

I mention this not to discredit or belittle Judy Gross' emotions and feelings, but to say that we, too, have been there. As Cuban exiles and children of Cuban exiles, we have all experienced that same loss at the same or even more extreme level. We have all struggled through the stages of grief and loss and we understand what she is feeling and the heinousness of her experience. In desperate attempts to find a way to quell the pain, our anger has led some of us to blame those who had nothing to do with our situation. Some of us have also tried to bargain our way out to no avail. Three years is a horribly long time to sit and watch a loved one whither away in a dungeon for unjust reasons. So you can only imagine how horrible it must be for Cubans on and off the island to experience the same pain for decades.

As long as Alan Gross remains a hostage of the Castro dictatorship, nothing good can happen.

Capitol Hill Cubans also addresses this situation:

Respectfully, Mrs. Gross is Wrong

In today's New York Times, the wife of Castro's American hostage Alan Gross, has unfortunately misdirected her frustration.

Alan is a victim of 50 years of failed policy with Cuba,” said Judy Gross.

Respectfully, Mrs. Gross, Alan is not a victim of U.S. policy.

Alan is the victim of a brutal totalitarian dictatorship, which has complete disregard for human rights and international law.

Providing Internet access to the Cuban people, as Alan was doing, is protected under international law.

It is encapsulated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

Our community understands Mrs. Gross's frustration better anyone else.

We have seen our friends and families beaten, imprisoned and executed for 50 years.

Moreover, we understand what it's like to feel as if the world doesn't care.

Just this week, we have seen foreign news bureaus in Havana report on a new ballet for obese people and a fancy dog show, rather than on the spike in repression against peaceful democracy activists.

Mrs. Gross then sadly proceeds to state that she believes her husband is “a pawn of these very radical right-wing Cuba haters, for lack of a better word, who don’t want to see any changes happen, even to get Alan home.”

We undoubtedly stand in solidarity with Mrs. Gross in wanting to see her husband released.

Moreover, we want to see changes happen more than anyone else.

We long for fundamental change in Cuba, where human rights are respected and people are free to choose their own destiny -- a Cuba, where Alan Gross and others like him will not be taken hostage for helping Cubans connect to the Internet.

That is exactly what U.S. policy is conditioned towards.

But that doesn't make us "radical right-wing Cuba haters" anymore than it would make Mrs. Gross one for stridently advocating for her husband's freedom.

7 comments to The saga continues for Alan Gross in Cuba

  • asombra

    Extremely distasteful but quite predictable. She's going for the path of least resistance and highest probability of acceptance by the Castro regime, the Obama people and all the usual suspects in the media and elsewhere. It doesn't matter how well she actually "gets it;" I expect she's been advised to make "those people" the villains of the piece, and certainly not to call a spade a spade. I understand where she's coming from perfectly well, but saying her husband is a pawn of "very radical right-wing Cuba haters" is as offensive as it is unjust. It's as if she'd been told to say that by Havana, because that's EXACTLY what the Castro regime wants her to say, and of course it also lets the Obama administration off the hook. Well, I suppose tactics are tactics, and if anybody's going to get the short end of the stick, you know who that is. Same shit, different day.

  • maristas60

    Mr de la Cruz, you are too nice.Excuse my lack of correctness , fuck you Mrs Gross and the New York Times. If Mr Groos dies in a Cuban jail then you will understand why we "right wing Cuban haters" feel how we do.

  • FreedomForCuba

    Ditto Maristas60,

    Looks like Mr. Gross wanted to play the role of "International supporter of the Cuban dissidence" against Fidel and Raul Castro (I wonder who encouraged him on that role), and could never phamton what he was getting into.

    Worst of it, he doesn't the balls for such ordeal...

  • Not mentioned in the NYT piece, or by Mrs. Gross, is that while Alan Gross was taking equipment to Cuba and giving it to special interest groups who desperately needed it, he wasnt necessarily doing so out of the goodness of his heart. His work wasnt pro bono. He was being paid and paid well. So, with all due respect, the evil intransigent Cuban American community does what they do out of CONVICTION, while Gross did it FOR THE MONEY.

  • asombra

    Since Castro, Inc. is doing what it is bound to do (same as a cobra being venomous), and NOTHING better can be expected from it, it is up to the Obama administration to do what it CAN do and COULD have done LONG ago: make it too costly for Castro, Inc. to retain Gross. Obama is responsible for Gross, period, and you’d better believe a Republican president would be under MASSIVE pressure to free a liberal like Gross if he were being held by a right-wing dictatorship. Obama, however, gets a pass from everybody, including the Gross camp, for reasons I need not explain, and “those people” will get shafted, for the zillionth time, for closely related reasons. This stuff is like clockwork.

    There's little or no point in getting angry at Mrs. Gross, who's simply doing whatever she thinks will get her husband freed. She's playing what would appear to be her best (and safest) available card: make "those people" the fall guys, even though their victimization by Castro, Inc. is infinitely greater than her husband's. Still, given the reality of the situation, twisted and perverse though it is, her tactic is understandable. She will certainly have the likes of the New York Times on her side, whereas putting the blame where it belongs is much less marketable. So, like the bank robber of the story, she's going where the money is, figuratively speaking. Nobody ever said expediency was pretty.

  • maristas60

    Lo siento mucho, no tengo mas tolerancia para aquellos que siguen tirando fango al exilio y los que estamos en contra de todo lo sucedido en Cuba y el sistema castrista.

  • Marista60, rewrite your comment in English and explain who you mean.