support babalú

Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying






recommended reading

babalú features

recent comments

  • asombra: Given Che’s views on the legal system, what kind of lawyer would hang his photo in his office?

  • asombra: Didn’t Rousseau look pretty? Should have been a romance novelist and left it at that.

  • asombra: The Gross business was always dubious, and now it stinks like rotting fish. Whatever sympathy I had for the man is gone.

  • asombra: As for Whitehouse, he’s a classic condescending bigot. Jackass.

  • asombra: Schizophrenic? Try full of shit. A real schizophrenic has an illness he cannot help; the NYT is not even remotely that innocent....

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

elsewhere on the net


Insurance company: Alan Gross not covered

Tracey Eaton at Along the Malecon:

Insurance company: Alan Gross not covered
Poor, poor Alan Gross.

Lisa Bonanno

A New Jersey insurance company denied Friday that it owed any money to Gross, an American development worker jailed in Cuba since 2009.

A lawyer for Federal Insurance Company said Gross wasn't covered under the kidnap and ransom policy that Development Alternatives Inc., or DAI, purchased in 2009.

Under the $5 million policy, Federal agreed to pay Bethesda, Md.-based DAI certain costs if any of its employees were wrongfully detained.

Cuban authorities arrested Gross in December 2009 and accused him of bringing satellite communication gear into the country in violation of Cuban law. He was later sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Gross and his wife, Judith Gross, sued Federal on Nov. 16, saying they were entitled to compensation under the policy. But Lisa R. Bonanno, a Washington, D.C., lawyer for Federal, said Gross wasn't eligible to collect any money.
In court documents filed Friday, Bonanno cited three reasons:

  1. First, Plaintiffs lack standing to pursue the claims alleged in the Complaint. ...the policy only requires Federal to provide coverage to DAI for the expenses that it pays in connection with a Wrongful Detention. Thus, the policyholder DAI – and DAI alone – is the only party entitled to make the claim that Plaintiffs bring here.
  2. All of the counts pled in the Complaint are based on the false premise that Federal is obligated to provide coverage directly to the Plaintiffs. That premise clearly is wrong and is belied by the unambiguous terms of the policy, which only require Federal to reimburse DAI for the expenses that it pays. In fact, the policy makes clear that no “loss” is deemed to have been sustained unless DAI has made such a payment.
  3. ... Federal’s only obligation under the policy is to reimburse DAI for the expenses that it actually pays. Thus, unless and until that happens, Federal has no duty to pay anything.

Bonanno also said the Gross family's lawsuit against Federal could not be settled until a separate lawsuit they filed against DAI had run its course.

Continue reading HERE.

2 comments to Insurance company: Alan Gross not covered

  • asombra

    Why should the insurance company cover him if the government who sent him won't?

  • antonio2009

    Alan "Woe-Is-Me" Gross has regarded the issue of freedom for Cuba as nothing more than a financial crusade for himself. He needs to man up and complete the rest of his sentence, just like Mario Chanes, Armando Valladares, and other brave Cuban political prisoners did.