A Brit doing the job of the Yank MSM

dictator
(Picture via Instapundit)

In the last four-plus years of Obama’s occupation of the Oval Office he has, on more than one occasion, lamented his limited powers of being an elected representative at the mercy of the U.S. Constitution. Today was no different. From the 2008 democrat primary campaigns to now we have seen the vindictive and thuggish nature and practices of this man and his administration, all under the gleeful cover of the American MSM.

However, thankfully our British cousins, such as Nile Gardiner, are far less fawning, adoring, and fearful to call it like it is… “A nasty, brutish, imperial presidency”

Thomas Hobbes wrote that the life of man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” Today’s White House definitely isn’t poor, lavishly feeding off the wealth of the American taxpayer, and the current presidency certainly isn’t short, with nearly four more years to run. But it is undeniably nasty and brutish, as veteran Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward has found after questioning President Obama’s narrative on the sequester issue.

[…]

The threats being dished out to Woodward, Davis and others are extremely disturbing in a free society, and are a reflection of an imperial presidency that acts with impunity and is highly intolerant of dissent. The heavy-arm tactics that Obama’s team have deployed for years against conservatives are now being increasingly implemented as well against liberals questioning the president’s record.

Leading US political analyst Michael Barone predicted all this in a piece for National Review Online back in October 2008, when he wrote about “The Coming Obama Thugocracy.” It is an article that is strikingly accurate in its predictions.

[…]

Will American liberals now stand up to the Obama White House and condemn its blatant attempts to suppress criticism and free speech? I doubt it. The Washington Post has provided relatively little coverage of the story, despite the fact that one its own star writers has been targeted. The New York Times is, unsurprisingly, completely silent (with the exception of a small mention in a single blog) on the issue. Ironically, most of the reporting of the White House’s attempts to intimidate liberal critics has come from the conservative press, led by the Drudge Report, which has propelled the story to national prominence. Both conservatives and liberals should be rallying to the defence of free speech and freedom of the press, holding the Obama presidency to account. All Americans should be concerned by government attempts to stifle press criticism in the land of the free, tactics which undermine the very foundations of liberty.

Bonus:

“NH Gun Store Depicts Obama As ‘Firearms Salesman Of The Year’”

2 thoughts on “A Brit doing the job of the Yank MSM

  1. What has happened to Freedom of Expression? I remember the liberals were always fond of saying, “I may disagree what what you have to say, but I will die defending your right to say it,” but apparently all of that has gone out the window now that Obama is in office.

Comments are closed.