PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • asombra: Che Guevara, for one, was all for the USSR crushing the Hungarian uprising, just as Fidel later kissed Soviet ass by being all...

  • asombra: Carlos, it’s OK. They’re Latrines, which means their concept of shame and disgrace is VERY different from yours, so...

  • asombra: The NYT is simply protecting its creature, its Frankenstein, as it always has and always will. The Herbert Matthews business was...

  • asombra: Bad Negroes have to be taught a lesson. Massah Castro don’t like no uppity slaves, especially black ones.

  • asombra: A lot of these people object to Hitler merchandising more out of social conditioning than true moral outrage. That’s also...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Odebrecht wins challenge to will of Florida voters, maintains partnership with Cuba’s dictatorship

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

Capitol Hill Cubans
The Will of Taxpayers Will Ultimately Prevail

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ("the Court") has upheld a challenge by Brazil's Odebrecht against a Florida law banning contracts with companies with business ties to Cuba and Syria.

This law was passed by a near-unanimous vote in the Florida legislature and approved by over 62% of Miami-Dade County voters.

Sadly, Odebrecht -- a key business partner of Cuba's dictatorship -- chose to legally challenge the will of Florida's taxpayers, rather than sever its ties with the Castro brothers.

In sum, the Court held that the Florida law "conflicts" with federal sanctions towards Cuba because it fails to address some of the current exemptions in U.S. law -- namely the cash-sale of agriculture and medical products.

We respectfully disagree with this decision, for under its controlling precedent in Faculty Senate of Florida International University v. Winn, 616 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2010), the Court upheld a state ban on academic travel to Cuba, despite an explicit exemption for academic travel under federal law.

Furthermore, we believe taxpayers have an inherent right to decide where (and with whom) they want their money spent.

Needless to say, we respect the Court's decision.

Fortunately though, we live in a representative democracy, where the voice and the will of the taxpayer will ultimately prevail.

Comments are closed.