PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Honey: Antonio2009, thank you for that article. How important to see that it was Eric Holder who played a big part in that terrible...

  • Gallardo: Asombra, this is what Clinton was occupied with (among other things) while 9/11 was being cooked under his nose. It was...

  • antonio2009: Here is what I wrote about the case in an encyclopedia http://www.latinamericanstudie s.org/academic/Elian-Gonzalez. pdf and...

  • asombra: With every anniversary of this outrage, my contempt deepens for those who actively supported it and the subsequent infamy of...

  • Humberto Fontova: Another valuable Babalu exclusive (in English.)

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The Left’s Politcally Correct Dictatorships

Steven Hayward in PowerLine:

PC Dictatorships and Double Standards

“Dictatorships and Double Standards” is of course the title of Jeane Kirkpatrick’s famous Commentary article about how “human rights” liberals of the time were hard on our allies who had less than stellar human rights records, but supine in the face of totalitarians like the Soviet Union and its allies such as Cuba.  (Because, as we all know, Cuba’s literacy and universal health care are more important than bourgeois rights like free speech, etc.)

It’s time for an update, with reference to the juxtaposition of the treatment of Niall Ferguson and Dick Harpootlian, which shows liberal double standards at work once again.  (Repeat the old joke here, if liberals didn’t have double standards. . . etc.)

Ferguson, as you’ve likely heard, decided to tempt the PC gods by speculating at an investment conference last week that John Maynard Keynes’s economic philosophy—or at least his famous comment dismissing the long-run effects of his deficit-spending formula that “In the long run we’re all dead”—might have some relation to his homosexuality and lack of children.  This is not a brand new idea about Keynes, as Jonah Goldberg reviews here, but liberals have reacted as if Ferguson had questioned the saintliness of Gandhi or something.  And while the idea that attachment to posterity through our children is far from being outré, it does seems a stretch to reduce Keynes’s layered views to this sole anthropological dimension.  After all, lots and lots of heterosexuals with children believe in unsound economic and social theories, too.  What was Ferguson thinking?  Did he think, “Gee—I’d really like to see what it’s like to emulate Larry Summers?”  (Ferguson is the Tisch professor of history at Harvard.)

Continue reading HERE.

Comments are closed.