PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Ziva Sahl: “make no mistake, those who condoned, let alone shared, his grotesque double-standard are not much better than he was,...

  • asombra: Photo caption: “Gabo, I’d let you blow me again, because I know how much it means to you, but really, you’re...

  • asombra: Inconceivably? Not at all. It’s eminently Latrine. As for his literary legacy, that doesn’t concern me one way or...

  • asombra: But hey, let’s be grateful such a giant of literature deigned to notice little old Cuba, and that he evidently held no...

  • asombra: OK, I read the rest of this tripe. It could all be knowing and deliberate ass-kissing, meaning Gabo knew it was BS, or it could...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The Left’s Politcally Correct Dictatorships

Steven Hayward in PowerLine:

PC Dictatorships and Double Standards

“Dictatorships and Double Standards” is of course the title of Jeane Kirkpatrick’s famous Commentary article about how “human rights” liberals of the time were hard on our allies who had less than stellar human rights records, but supine in the face of totalitarians like the Soviet Union and its allies such as Cuba.  (Because, as we all know, Cuba’s literacy and universal health care are more important than bourgeois rights like free speech, etc.)

It’s time for an update, with reference to the juxtaposition of the treatment of Niall Ferguson and Dick Harpootlian, which shows liberal double standards at work once again.  (Repeat the old joke here, if liberals didn’t have double standards. . . etc.)

Ferguson, as you’ve likely heard, decided to tempt the PC gods by speculating at an investment conference last week that John Maynard Keynes’s economic philosophy—or at least his famous comment dismissing the long-run effects of his deficit-spending formula that “In the long run we’re all dead”—might have some relation to his homosexuality and lack of children.  This is not a brand new idea about Keynes, as Jonah Goldberg reviews here, but liberals have reacted as if Ferguson had questioned the saintliness of Gandhi or something.  And while the idea that attachment to posterity through our children is far from being outré, it does seems a stretch to reduce Keynes’s layered views to this sole anthropological dimension.  After all, lots and lots of heterosexuals with children believe in unsound economic and social theories, too.  What was Ferguson thinking?  Did he think, “Gee—I’d really like to see what it’s like to emulate Larry Summers?”  (Ferguson is the Tisch professor of history at Harvard.)

Continue reading HERE.

Comments are closed.