Cuba’s uncooperative cooperatives

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

More “Experimental” Cooperatives Nonsense

The media has been abuzz regarding Cuban dictator Raul Castro’s decision to authorize over 124 “experimental”  non-agricultural cooperatives.

Perhaps this would be newsworthy if Raul’s agricultural cooperatives had been a success, but they’ve been an absolute failure.

The Castros have been “experimenting” with agricultural cooperatives since the 1970’s, with Raul intensifying the “experiment” in 2008.

Yet, even The New York Times recognized last December that these have netted few results — if any:

[B]y most measures, the project has failed. Because of waste, poor management, policy constraints, transportation limits, theft and other problems, overall efficiency has dropped: many Cubans are actually seeing less food at private markets.”

So what makes anyone think similarly structured non-agricultural cooperatives will fare any better?

Moreover, let’s remember that Castro’s cooperatives do not bestow any property or ownership rights among the participants.  Like in the case of agricultural cooperatives, it simply leases operating concessions from the state.

Also, in the case of these non-agricultural cooperatives, they can only be “for activities that are not transcendental for the country’s economy.”  In other words, for the bread crumbs left over by the Cuban military’s enterprises.

If the Castro regime wanted the Cuban people to genuinely prosper — instead of just enriching its cronies and buying itself time — it wouldn’t keep distracting (and the media playing along) with these ridiculous “experiments.”

It would grant the Cuban people ownership rights and set them free.

One thought on “Cuba’s uncooperative cooperatives

  1. But failure is fine, as long as the “revolution” stays afloat and in control. The revolution was NOT about helping the people, but rather about empowering a few. In that sense, it’s been a great success.

Comments are closed.