PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • asombra: Oh, this will get a response: Dear Ms. Paya: Thank you for your letter. The President understands he cannot please everybody,...

  • asombra: Courting dictators? Try dropping your pants and bending over, which is far more like it.

  • asombra: You know what bothers me most about the photo of Obama and Francis? That it is essentially the exact same photo we’d get...

  • asombra: There’s no telling what kind of cigar games, or their equivalent, JFK played with his little friends. The fact he was sold...

  • asombra: I suspect the NYT put Dr. Eire’s book on its dubious little list not because it liked his book, but because it wanted to...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Cuba’s uncooperative cooperatives

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

More "Experimental" Cooperatives Nonsense

The media has been abuzz regarding Cuban dictator Raul Castro's decision to authorize over 124 "experimental"  non-agricultural cooperatives.

Perhaps this would be newsworthy if Raul's agricultural cooperatives had been a success, but they've been an absolute failure.

The Castros have been "experimenting" with agricultural cooperatives since the 1970's, with Raul intensifying the "experiment" in 2008.

Yet, even The New York Times recognized last December that these have netted few results -- if any:

"[B]y most measures, the project has failed. Because of waste, poor management, policy constraints, transportation limits, theft and other problems, overall efficiency has dropped: many Cubans are actually seeing less food at private markets."

So what makes anyone think similarly structured non-agricultural cooperatives will fare any better?

Moreover, let's remember that Castro's cooperatives do not bestow any property or ownership rights among the participants.  Like in the case of agricultural cooperatives, it simply leases operating concessions from the state.

Also, in the case of these non-agricultural cooperatives, they can only be "for activities that are not transcendental for the country’s economy."  In other words, for the bread crumbs left over by the Cuban military's enterprises.

If the Castro regime wanted the Cuban people to genuinely prosper -- instead of just enriching its cronies and buying itself time -- it wouldn't keep distracting (and the media playing along) with these ridiculous "experiments."

It would grant the Cuban people ownership rights and set them free.

1 comment to Cuba’s uncooperative cooperatives

  • asombra

    But failure is fine, as long as the "revolution" stays afloat and in control. The revolution was NOT about helping the people, but rather about empowering a few. In that sense, it's been a great success.