PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Rayarena: I agree with you. It’s genetic. By the way, if it wasn’t for the European Union and in particular West Germany,...

  • asombra: Ray, our utterly appalling fuck-up, which was both irrational and unbelievably stupid, may be a hereditary disorder. Spain, who...

  • Rayarena: Asombra, Tragically, its the nature of Cubans to do just that: manufacture failure from potential success. Just look at the...

  • asombra: Cuba’s was a fail of massive proportions, or snatching miserable failure from the jaws of major success.

  • Rayarena: Fifty-six years of “revolutionary” austerity, of sacrifices, of military conscription, of forced rationing, of...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The Most Ignored Administration in History

For starters, Democrat strategist Pat Caddell gives his ideas on why Rep. John Boehner has done little to nothing on the Benghazi and IRS investigations of the administration:

Mr. Caddell has back-up on his assertions...

IBD: A Select Committee Needed In IRS, Benghazi Scandals

Victor Davis Hanson @ NRO: Obama’s Watergates: Denial, evasion, “Let me be perfectly clear” — is this 2013 or 1973?

But wait, it gets even better...

Doug Ross @ Journal: BOMBSHELL REPORT: Valerie Jarrett Gave the Orders on 9/11/2012 and Blocked Rescue in Benghazi

However, a glint of admission comes from the media itself as to why the press finds it difficult to ask Obama, or anyone in the administration, the much needed and demanded tough questions:

As the one year anniversary of the deadly attack on an American consulate in Benghazi approaches, journalists have begun to take another look into the scandal surrounding the government’s response to that terrorist event. Last week, CNN aired two striking reports revealing that the Central Intelligence Agency had a large number of agents on the ground on the night of the attack and that a suspect in the attack has never been interviewed by investigators. Following these revelatory reports, which some in President Barack Obama’s administration believe represent a political threat, some CNN reporters now fear for their access to the White House. They are not alone.

On July 31, CNN’s The Situation Room broadcast a portion of an interview conducted by reporter Arwa Damon with a suspect in the Benghazi attacks. The suspect revealed to Damon that no investigator has attempted to contact him regarding his involvement in that deadly assault. The following day, CNN’s Drew Griffin broke the news that more than 30 CIA agents were on the ground in Libya on the day of the attack and they are being pressured by the spy agency to not reveal to reporters or congressional investigators what they know of the events of that night. Some CNN reporters are reportedly fearful now that their access to the White House will be hampered following their probing into a story that members of the Obama administration would prefer remain uninvestigated.

“Access is a very serious consideration when it comes to stories that could adversely impact a show, correspondent, or network’s relationship with the administration, a campaign, or any political leader,” one source with insider information told Mediaite.

“I would suggest it’s not an accident that those who have been given a lot of access to the president have generally been AWOL when it comes to stories that might reflect poorly on him,” the source, who did not wish to be identified, continued. “It’s the name of the game. And it’s bad for everyone trying to do this job the right way.” Those reporters have reason to fear for their access to America’s executive branch. Some suspect that reporters who soft-pedal or underreport stories uncomfortable to the administration receive preferential access to White House officials.

And then there are those pesky al Qaeda prison breaks just screaming for attention, in addition to Iraq falling apart.

Glenn Beck asks: "Why is no one talking about the three huge prison breaks in the Middle East?"

And how about Obama refusing to even talk about the recent terror threat with the press, but possibly giving the one and only question on the situation to a late night comedian?

President Obama continues to say nothing to a jittery nation about what some who have been briefed on the danger are describing as the worst terrorist threat since 9/11, declining to either offer reassurance or an explanation of the peril the nation faces.

Certainly, the president does not want to take questions about a threat he had minimized during the 2012 campaign. But what’s striking is that he has not addressed the nation in a formal manner on the potential for a major attack.

Incredibly, the first question Obama might take on the situation could come from a comedian. Obama is scheduled to appear on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno this evening in California, and the topic is sure to come up. He has an event earlier in the day, but it’s a campaign-style appearance at a high school in Phoenix, also an odd venue to be discussing potential terrorist attacks.

Hey, MSM, you're not the least bit pissed about this? I mean, can you imagine how the very same MSM would be reacting were it Pres. George W. Bush spending the weekend golfing while a record number of U.S. embassies in the world were closed due to a hightened terror threat(s) here and abroad ... and then ducking onto a late night entertainment show for a bit of softball back-and-forth?

1 comment to The Most Ignored Administration in History

  • asombra

    Maggie, I know you know, but it's very simple: the mainstream media is CORRUPT. They're really too far gone to straighten up, realistically speaking. The only hope is to replace them with truly different people, not just similar dogs with different collars. Unfortunately, the rot is not confined to the media, which reflects a degenerate electorate and society--which is why the media gets away with being putrid.

    As for Obama, I'm past being angry and outraged at him, because he's simply not the problem. I genuinely can't get worked up over him very much anymore, because when I look at him , I see a mere effect, not a cause. He's really a paltry, banal, overblown and oversold sham, even if he believes it himself. The problem is those who would enable such a creature to any position of significant authority or influence, let alone the White House. But hey, they're out there, all over the place, even now with serious scandals galore. THEY are what really angers and outrages me, as well as scares me. Alas, they are essentially irrational, and, by definition, such people cannot be reasoned with. God help us.