PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • antonio2009: Here is the news coverage of when Elian was seized at gunpoint by 151 federal agents, including a dozen members of the...

  • asombra: It may be that practically anyone subjected to the intense, sustained, professional indoctrination Elian has been under since...

  • asombra: “No fresh ideas.” The point is not how fresh, but how sound and sensible. Fatuous cretin.

  • asombra: Former FBI Director Louis Freeh, who’s from NJ, has said he tried trading the “Cuban 5″ for Chesimard and...

  • asombra: Omar, he looks like what he was turned into: a Stepford Castroite.

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The media’s “Best and Brightest!” (The Atlantic mag) can’t figure out what kind of hammer the U.S. holds over Cuba

jerry_lewisjerk

Turns out, the U.S. pressured Cuba to snub Snowden. From the Atlantic Mag.

The paper then added even more to the tale, by stating that Snowden's failure to reach Havana was not because Russian interference, or the loss of his official status once the U.S. revoked his passport. It was Cubans who kept him from getting on the plane. Kommersant says the Cubans balked under pressure from the U.S., which threatened "undesirable consequences" for any country that took him in. It's hard to imagine what could be more undesirable than the decades-old embargo the Americans already have on its island neighbor.

Ground control to The Atlantic: Most estimates put the cash-flow from the U.S. to Cuba (remittances, travel, etc.) at about $4 billion annually. In comparison, Soviet subsidies to Cuba during the 70-80's were about $3.8 billion annually. Are you implying that the Soviets couldn't have "pressured" Castro at the time?

Much of this windfall from the U.S. could end with a few strokes of the U.S. presidential pen. So there's your "undesirable consequences." Note how the Castro regime snapped to attention and stepped and fetched on the Snowden issue. They know who butters their bread.

Not that we would expect such a high-brow publication to know any of this. Recall the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg from a coupla years ago:

“I judge his (Castro’s) revolution against what it replaced, namely, the thugocracy of Batista, who was a friend only to a handful of oligarchs and American mafia leaders.”

jerryjerry4
"WHAT?!--Ya mean Castro gets mucho dinero from the U.S.!?" (gasps the ultra-educated columnist for one of America's most highbrow magazines.)

Comments are closed.