PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Gallardo: His posture next to Castro is indeed subservient and effeminate, in both pictures. Even the way he stares at Raul in the third...

  • Gallardo: One less communist piece of shit.

  • antonio2009: How about the fawning Shimon Peres letter to Fidel Castro in 2010, for starters? http://www.theatlantic.com/...

  • Honey: asombra, that was my point. antonio2009, what have you got against Israel? I don’t want them to take up the American,...

  • FaustaR: Thanks for the link. I couldn’t make up this stuff if I tried.

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The media’s “Best and Brightest!” (The Atlantic mag) can’t figure out what kind of hammer the U.S. holds over Cuba

jerry_lewisjerk

Turns out, the U.S. pressured Cuba to snub Snowden. From the Atlantic Mag.

The paper then added even more to the tale, by stating that Snowden's failure to reach Havana was not because Russian interference, or the loss of his official status once the U.S. revoked his passport. It was Cubans who kept him from getting on the plane. Kommersant says the Cubans balked under pressure from the U.S., which threatened "undesirable consequences" for any country that took him in. It's hard to imagine what could be more undesirable than the decades-old embargo the Americans already have on its island neighbor.

Ground control to The Atlantic: Most estimates put the cash-flow from the U.S. to Cuba (remittances, travel, etc.) at about $4 billion annually. In comparison, Soviet subsidies to Cuba during the 70-80's were about $3.8 billion annually. Are you implying that the Soviets couldn't have "pressured" Castro at the time?

Much of this windfall from the U.S. could end with a few strokes of the U.S. presidential pen. So there's your "undesirable consequences." Note how the Castro regime snapped to attention and stepped and fetched on the Snowden issue. They know who butters their bread.

Not that we would expect such a high-brow publication to know any of this. Recall the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg from a coupla years ago:

“I judge his (Castro’s) revolution against what it replaced, namely, the thugocracy of Batista, who was a friend only to a handful of oligarchs and American mafia leaders.”

jerryjerry4
"WHAT?!--Ya mean Castro gets mucho dinero from the U.S.!?" (gasps the ultra-educated columnist for one of America's most highbrow magazines.)

Comments are closed.