PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • antonio2009: It is now evident that Wayne Smith ES UN CHANCLETERO.

  • asombra: Can you say gerontocracy? I can, and spell it, too. And notice the token Negroes–in the back rows, of course.

  • asombra: In the photo with Smith, look how seedy, bogus and disreputable Fidel looks–a cheap, vulgar poseur. But yes, nearly all of...

  • Gallardo: Putting the Reagan era aside, USA has always been Castro’s best friend. The bloody con-artist owes USA for paving his way...

  • asombra: The New York Times is practically wetting itself over Castro, Inc.’s Ebola PR stunt. Same perverse shit, different day.

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The U.S. and Cuba: Lessons from the past

By Secretary Carlos Gutierrez and Dr. Jaime Suchlicki in The Miami Herald:

U.S.-Cuba: Lessons of the past

  Size as needed, Scratchboard-style illustration of Fidel Castro turning floodgate on a dam and letting flood of Cuban refugees pour out. The Miami Herald, 1994 CATEGORY: ILLUSTRATION SUBJECT: Cuban refugees illus. ARTIST: Patterson Clark ORIGIN: The Miami Herald TYPE: PhotoFlash TIFF SIZE: As needed ENTERED: 11/18/94 REVISED: STORY SLUG: Stand-alone illustration,scratchboard,Cuba,Castro,Fidel,refugees,boat,boatlift,Herald,Clark,1994  The Cuban leadership in Havana continues to try to woo the U.S. administration into providing unilateral concessions to Cuba. The embargo and the travel ban will be ended, they believe, as a result of internal pressures in the U.S. and a more accommodating Obama administration.

Yet, after seven years in power, Gen. Raúl Castro is unwilling to chart a radically new course for Cuba or offer meaningful concessions. Expectations remain that he will follow the Chinese or the Vietnamese model and even find an accommodation with the United States.

We seem to cling to an outdated economic determinism in trying to understand events in other societies and the motivations of their leaders. Despite economic difficulties, Raúl Castro does not seem ready to provide irreversible concessions for a U.S.-Cuba normalization. He may release and exile some political prisoners; he may offer more consumer goods and food to tranquilize the Cuban population; but no major structural reforms that would open the Cuban economy and no political openings.

It should have been obvious from the beginning that the Castro brothers were not interested in friendly relations with the United States. In spite of U.S. calls for moderation, the Castro brothers carried out public executions in the island. In public speeches Castro insulted President Eisenhower and followed them with expropriations of American properties. Finally in July 1960, Eisenhower was left with no option but to cut the Cuban sugar quota. By then the Cubans had already arranged for the Soviet Union to buy Cuban sugar.

During the Cuban missile crisis, Castro sent a message to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev calling for a preemptive nuclear strike against the U.S. mainland. Even the Soviets were shocked by the plea.

Continue reading HERE.

1 comment to The U.S. and Cuba: Lessons from the past

  • "Unfortunately, not all international problems can be solved through negotiation or with economic incentives. Some require significant patience until the leadership changes. The Cuban case seems one of these." Really, there could have been, in truth should have been military action taken long ago. We can make a mess of it in the Middle East, but 90 miles from our shore? As Humberto would say, unreal.