PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Val Prieto: The Zilber camp reached out to me – as well as a few others – and asked me to post the following: “Martin...

  • Gallardo: Asombra, Exactly, and the likes of the New York Times don’t care because Obama’s White House does not care....

  • Gallardo: I agree, not only will USA not defend or compensate Aruba for fighting battles on its behalf (we should all know about...

  • asombra: Was the Moncada attack necessary? Is that a trick question? Sort of like asking if Castro, Inc. was necessary. I mean,...

  • asombra: Neither of these SOBs is real military, just vile old farts in costume. They’re both symbolic of the...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

The U.S. and Cuba: Lessons from the past

By Secretary Carlos Gutierrez and Dr. Jaime Suchlicki in The Miami Herald:

U.S.-Cuba: Lessons of the past

  Size as needed, Scratchboard-style illustration of Fidel Castro turning floodgate on a dam and letting flood of Cuban refugees pour out. The Miami Herald, 1994 CATEGORY: ILLUSTRATION SUBJECT: Cuban refugees illus. ARTIST: Patterson Clark ORIGIN: The Miami Herald TYPE: PhotoFlash TIFF SIZE: As needed ENTERED: 11/18/94 REVISED: STORY SLUG: Stand-alone illustration,scratchboard,Cuba,Castro,Fidel,refugees,boat,boatlift,Herald,Clark,1994  The Cuban leadership in Havana continues to try to woo the U.S. administration into providing unilateral concessions to Cuba. The embargo and the travel ban will be ended, they believe, as a result of internal pressures in the U.S. and a more accommodating Obama administration.

Yet, after seven years in power, Gen. Raúl Castro is unwilling to chart a radically new course for Cuba or offer meaningful concessions. Expectations remain that he will follow the Chinese or the Vietnamese model and even find an accommodation with the United States.

We seem to cling to an outdated economic determinism in trying to understand events in other societies and the motivations of their leaders. Despite economic difficulties, Raúl Castro does not seem ready to provide irreversible concessions for a U.S.-Cuba normalization. He may release and exile some political prisoners; he may offer more consumer goods and food to tranquilize the Cuban population; but no major structural reforms that would open the Cuban economy and no political openings.

It should have been obvious from the beginning that the Castro brothers were not interested in friendly relations with the United States. In spite of U.S. calls for moderation, the Castro brothers carried out public executions in the island. In public speeches Castro insulted President Eisenhower and followed them with expropriations of American properties. Finally in July 1960, Eisenhower was left with no option but to cut the Cuban sugar quota. By then the Cubans had already arranged for the Soviet Union to buy Cuban sugar.

During the Cuban missile crisis, Castro sent a message to Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev calling for a preemptive nuclear strike against the U.S. mainland. Even the Soviets were shocked by the plea.

Continue reading HERE.

1 comment to The U.S. and Cuba: Lessons from the past

  • "Unfortunately, not all international problems can be solved through negotiation or with economic incentives. Some require significant patience until the leadership changes. The Cuban case seems one of these." Really, there could have been, in truth should have been military action taken long ago. We can make a mess of it in the Middle East, but 90 miles from our shore? As Humberto would say, unreal.