PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • Rayarena: Asombra: “The NYT knows exactly what the score is, as it always has, but it’s simply playing its long-accustomed...

  • asombra: Cuba is doing what suits Castro, Inc., period. But let’s give due credit: the regime could hardly be clearer. It’s...

  • asombra: Che Guevara, for one, was all for the USSR crushing the Hungarian uprising, just as Fidel later kissed Soviet ass by being all...

  • asombra: Carlos, it’s OK. They’re Latrines, which means their concept of shame and disgrace is VERY different from yours, so...

  • asombra: The NYT is simply protecting its creature, its Frankenstein, as it always has and always will. The Herbert Matthews business was...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Now more than ever, Cuba’s apartheid Castro regime dependent on subsidies

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

Castro More Dependent on Subsidies Than Ever

The Castro regime has forecast revenues of $8.2 billion from the contracting of its captive medical personnel abroad this year.

This has become -- overwhelmingly -- the regime's main export and source of income.

Of course, the problem is that over 80% ($6.8 billion) of the $8.2 billion comes from one source -- Venezuela.

This has nothing to do with the quality of Cuban doctors, or any market forces -- it's simply a subsidy.

For perspective, this subsidy alone (Venezuela provides various other handouts to Castro) is greater than the total sum of $3-5 billion in yearly subsidies that Castro received from the Soviet Union prior to 1991.

In 2009, Cuban economist Carmelo Mesa Lago had already corroborated that: "Venezuela's subsidy is higher in nominal terms than any historical subsidy provided by the Soviet Union to Cuba."

It is practically impossible for the Castro regime to overcome its serial dependency -- unless it fundamentally alters its political and economic system.

Yet, unfortunately, Castro is also a serial monopolist.

So it's laughable when "experts" argue that Castro's "new" (yet same as "old") foreign investment law will help wean Cuba off its dependency.

For example, this quote in Reuters by long-time Castro friend and apologist, Kirby Jones, who pushed back on the widespread (and well-founded) skepticism regarding the "new" law arguing that:

"[Cuba's] still a place to do business. Ask the Brazilians. They just put $800 million in there."

Sorry, Kirby -- but that too was a subsidy (from Brazil's government).

Note of caution to Brazil: Subsidies are never a good investment. Even worse in the case of Cuba, where history has shown how countries that subsidize Castro tend to implode economically.

Comments are closed.