PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • asombra: Che Guevara, for one, was all for the USSR crushing the Hungarian uprising, just as Fidel later kissed Soviet ass by being all...

  • asombra: Carlos, it’s OK. They’re Latrines, which means their concept of shame and disgrace is VERY different from yours, so...

  • asombra: The NYT is simply protecting its creature, its Frankenstein, as it always has and always will. The Herbert Matthews business was...

  • asombra: Bad Negroes have to be taught a lesson. Massah Castro don’t like no uppity slaves, especially black ones.

  • asombra: A lot of these people object to Hitler merchandising more out of social conditioning than true moral outrage. That’s also...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Hillary should say ‘Cuba Si, Castro No’

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

Hillary Should Say "Cuba Si, Castro No"

An editorial in today's New York Daily News praises former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for "saying si to Cuba." ("Hillary Says Si to Cuba".)

Here's its rationale:

"[T]he maturing of new generations of Cubans who are less hard-line has opened the door to overhauling our relationship with a still repressive Cuban regime that has been forced to take tiny steps toward economic liberalization."

Let's put aside the misguided political assumption regarding the "new generations of Cubans" -- an argument we've heard since the 1970s -- for this post.

From a policy perspective -- why would the U.S. want to "overhaul its relationship with a still repressive Cuban regime?"

Shouldn't policy overhauls be merited?

Shouldn't Hillary have learned this lesson from the policy overhauls she led towards Russia, Syria and Iran?

"Still repressive" regimes become "more repressive" when unchallenged -- and rhetoric doesn't cut it.

Moreover, why has the Castro regime "been forced to take tiny steps toward economic liberalization"?

Is it because they have so much money they don't know what to do with it?

Or to the contrary -- is it due to its failed policies and the crisis it faces from Venezuela's imminent collapse?

So why would we want to bail out the Castro regime with billions in U.S. trade, tourism, financing and investment -- all delivered and funneled through its monopolies?

For that's precisely what lifting the embargo would do.

History has clearly proven that the Castro regime only makes changes when forced to -- namely in times of crisis.

Thus, lifting U.S. sanctions and financially accommodating Castro's regime would be counter-productive (at best).

Perhaps Hillary (and the New York Daily News) should take note from Cuba's courageous democracy leaders, like The Ladies in White's Berta Soler (below).

It's "Cuba si, Castro no."

3 comments to Hillary should say ‘Cuba Si, Castro No’

  • Honey

    Maybe Cuba has videos of Hillary....

  • asombra

    If she made the trip, you'd better believe they've got photos. There's also the incident at some international "women's conference" she attended, along with another faux feminist, Cuba's Vilma Espín (Mariela's mother), at which she was extravagantly "friendly" with the Cuban bitch--meaning clearly more so than mere protocol would require. It is entirely possible that Mariela has had no problem visiting the US whenever she's wanted to because she had "palanca" (pull) at the State Department, like the SOS herself. However, as I've said about Billy boy, people like Hillary don't need to be blackmailed into shitty behavior--they do that "naturally" enough.