support babalú

Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying






recommended reading

babalú features

recent comments

  • asombra: Honey, please. Obama is the first Jewish president, or as Jewish as Clinton was black.

  • asombra: Rhetorical question: Can one respect anyone of normal IQ who voted for Obama, especially twice?

  • Honey: And still no American embassy in Jerusalem. I despair.

  • asombra: But Carlos, you sound so jaded. Maybe you should have a nice chat with a Cuba “expert.” You know, like that little...

  • asombra: “If [the pope] keeps talking like this, I’ll return to the Church,” saith the dictator. Translation: “If he keeps helping...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

elsewhere on the net


Cuba and Sanctions: What really motivates ruthless dictators

It is a never ending siren song by "Cuba Experts" and Castro propagandists that the ignorant find difficult to resist: Lift sanctions against the apartheid regime of Cuba's ruthless Castro dictatorship and liberating democracy will suddenly and magically appear on the island. Not only does this argument defy all logic, it boldly defies history; even recent history. But while people willing to be ignorant of logic and history continue to exist, dictators will have their "experts" and propagandists who will be more than happy to mislead them.

Via Capitol Hill Cubans:

How to Stifle "Reforms"

Anti-sanctions lobbyists like to argue that prematurely lifting sanctions will encourage dictators to "reform."

Just this week in The Hill, the Brookings Insitution's Richard Feinberg wrote an article entitled "President Obama could use a win," in which he argues that the U.S. would "accelerate" Raul's "reforms" by lifting sanctions.

Of course, he doesn't explain how this would work.

Moreover, there's no evidence to show how prematurely lifting sanctions has ever initiated or accelerated any dictator's reforms.

To the contrary, it's the surest way to stifle reforms -- as the Obama Administration is recently learning in Burma.

These anti-sanctions lobbyists overlook a fundamental premise:

Dictators do not initiate reforms because they want to. Dictators only initiate reforms when forced to.

In Burma, the pressure of sanctions had forced its regime to undertake a host of reforms.

(Burma's political reforms have been more significant than anything we've seen in China or Vietnam. Not to mention far greater than anything we've seen from Raul Castro in Cuba. For more on this, read "To Change Cuba, Stick With the Burma Model".)

President Obama was swayed by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton -- despite objections from others in his Administration -- that prematurely lifting sanctions and high-level engagement would help "accelerate" Burma's reforms.

Unfortunately, the exact opposite is now happening.

As The Washington Post reported last week:

"[T]wo years after Obama made a historic visit to the Southeast Asian nation, the achievement is in jeopardy.

Burma’s government has cracked down on the media. The parliament is considering laws that could restrict religious freedom. And revered opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, who welcomed Obama to her home in 2012, remains constitutionally barred from running for president as the country heads into a pivotal election next year.

The situation is most dire in Burma’s western reaches, where more than 100,000 Rohingya Muslims are living as virtual prisoners, with little access to health care and food. The fast-deteriorating conditions prompted Tomás Ojéa Quintana, a former United Nations special rapporteur for human rights, to say in April that there is an “element of genocide” in the Rohingyas’ plight.

The setbacks have raised the stakes for Obama’s scheduled November visit to a regional conference in Burma, during which the administration had hoped to showcase the country’s progress as part of its strategic 'rebalance' toward Asia. Now even some of Obama’s allies on Capitol Hill have begun to question whether the administration has moved too quickly to embrace Burma’s leadership."

Feinberg is right that President Obama "could use a foreign policy win."

For starters, he can ignore Feinberg's advice.

2 comments to Cuba and Sanctions: What really motivates ruthless dictators

  • asombra

    Don't you love Cuba's "vice-president" in the middle? And people say Biden is a joke. As for Cuba's "president," he looks like an old lesbian in military drag. The stoned-looking slug at far right is just a background object, like a piece of furniture, or a dumb waiter. We have SO much to be proud of, no?

    It's really quite remarkable that so many supposedly sharp, sophisticated people could ever look at these clowns with anything better than derisive contempt, because this shit is NOT subtle. Just goes to show you how many people are simply full of it. Well, either that or retarded, but the former is far more common.

    As for the Burmese assholes, same shit, different ethnicity.

  • La Conchita

    Ever wonder why their favorite garb is to be in military uniforms?

    Because, since the very first day, the very FIRST DAY, they have been at WAR AGAINST THE CUBAN PEOPLE!