PINAR DEL RIO


support babalú


Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying


bestlatinosmall.jpg

quotes.gif

activism


ozt_bilingual


buclbanner

recommended reading





babalú features





recent comments


  • asombra: If this pope ever wants my respect, he’d better have an incredible mea culpa ready, and I mean epic.

  • asombra: I’m telling you, those typical Cuban women are to die for, even if they’d make Aunt Jemima blush with shame. But...

  • asombra: Queen Marie Antoinette never said “If the people have no bread, let them eat cake,” but even if she had, she would...

  • asombra: This noxious asshole isn’t worth a response, being merely a generic academic POS, but he begs a very common question:...

  • TWFKAP: Fucking disgusting. But then, what else can we expect from the sub-human trash that is the left…

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics


elsewhere on the net



realclearworld

Why you shouldn’t believe everything you read about U.S. democracy programs in Cuba

Jose Cardenas in Foreign Policy:

Don't Believe Everything You Read About the United States' Cuba Democracy Program

For the second time in four months, the Associated Press has published a gross distortion of USAID's Cuba Democracy Program that has made it the subject of unjust derision from the legions of U.S.-Cuba policy critics. The news agency evidently believes it has stumbled upon a vast, sinister U.S. conspiracy to overthrow the Castro regime, calling to mind those halcyon days of exploding cigars and poisoned wetsuits. It is nothing of the sort.

Previously, APreported that USAID sought to foment an uprising in Cuba by introducing a rudimentary Twitter service for Cubans to utilize free of regime snooping. Now, we are told that USAID sent hapless youths from Latin America to Cuba to recruit agents to lead that national uprising.

Such assertions are ridiculous on their face. Moreover, it is distressing to see how easily people can apparently accept the notion that their government would involve itself in such lunacy.

The good news is, we don't. As I have written previously, I was intimately involved in implementing USAID's Cuba Program in the latter years of the George W. Bush administration. I wrote about the Twitter program back in April, and I participated in discussions during the Bush administration about ways to encourage purposeful foreign travel to Cuba by fellow Spanish-speakers to break down the Cuban people's isolation.

These were not spotty spring-breakers or members of loopy tourist groups that are licensed to travel to Cuba today on "cultural exchanges." They were seasoned members of Latin American NGOs with a commitment to democracy, civil rights, and human development. Their task was to develop relationships with ordinary Cubans outside of regime control for the express purpose of restoring to them some sense of individual self-worth and dignity that has been systematically trampled upon by the Castro regime for three generations. The idea that the U.S. government was running a "clandestine operation" to lead an uprising is simply risible.

Our real target was breaking down the barriers that the Castro regime imposes on Cuban citizens to keep them isolated from one another and civil society atomized. Helping individual Cubans to see themselves as human beings with natural rights -- indeed, in control of their own destiny -- and connecting them to the outside world was part of the strategy. I would venture to say that people on the streets of Peoria would hardly find such a policy as scandalous as AP apparently does.

Beyond the gross mischaracterization of the program, however, there appear to be other serious problems with AP's reporting, not least of which is that some of the groups interviewed by its reporters have subsequentlycomplained about the reporters' ethical violations, including quotes out of context, identifying interviewees despite their request for anonymity, and bullying them into giving answers that fit a predetermined narrative. USAID also criticized the report as "sensationalist" in a strongly worded defense of the program.

Continue reading HERE.

Comments are closed.