support babalú

Your donations help fund
our continued operation

do you babalú?

what they’re saying






recommended reading

babalú features

recent comments

  • paul vincent zecchino: asombra - I suspect you are correct in all your assertions. As ever. Thank you for stating truth.

  • Rayarena: First off, I’m enormously proud and grateful of all of the Cubans who have come forward and spoken to the media, our...

  • asombra: I suspect Che may well have been a repressed homosexual, which would explain his virulent homophobia as a compensatory mechanism...

  • asombra: Obama’s fine with this, not just because he’s too narcissistic to see fault in anything he does, but because his...

  • asombra: Yes, the game is rigged and always was. That’s why we MUST stop relying on non-Cubans to do right by us. There are always...

search babalu

babalú archives

frequent topics

elsewhere on the net


The shamefulness and folly of ‘tourism’ to corrupt and repressive totalitarian regimes

John Suarez in Notes from the Cuban Exile Quarter:

Historical Lessons from Engaging Totalitarians: Tourism

Normally, travel broadens the mind but what about visiting a totalitarian state?

Jane Fonda visiting North Vietnam in July of 1972

Over the past few months there has been a vigorous debate around whether or not to continue economic sanctions on the dictatorship in Cuba and a series of manufactured controversies surrounding democracy promotion programs directed at the island has led to a conversation about their effectiveness. However, a couple of other issues that emerged but that have gone unaddressed are the conceits that American tourists, business, and high technology would somehow be game changers in Cuba and that "evolutionary change" would take place within Cuba. In this second installment will briefly explore some high profile examples of the impact of tourism on totalitarian states.

What has happened in the past when tourists take the lead in public diplomacy? Well it depends on what kind of tourist is visiting a totalitarian regime. Basically divide them into four general groups: bargain travelers, political pilgrims, celebrities, and informed travelers that know how totalitarian states function and know what they are getting into. The last group is almost always a very small number.

Bargain travelers will go to a totalitarian regime because often times it is a cheap holiday in an exotic location. Depending on the regime they will be kept in areas geared to tourists providing them a Potemkin village experience. However that does not mean that information on health and security will be accurate and it can place tourists at risk. In the case of both Cuba and North Korea, businessmen who have engaged the regime in business ventures are rotting in prison. There is also an ethical question providing hard currency to a system that is actively repressing its own populace and no matter how little it may be it is helping a totalitarian state.

Celebrities visiting totalitarian states become targets of both the state security service and the propaganda ministries. These regime will pull out all the stops to show themselves in the best light possible and make sure that celebrities have a great time but within a reality fabricated by the totalitarians. It has paid back with big dividends in the past.

Continue reading HERE.

3 comments to The shamefulness and folly of ‘tourism’ to corrupt and repressive totalitarian regimes

  • ranavy33

    Thanks for posting this. I'm sending it to some people I know.

  • asombra

    Ah, Jane. Such a classic...traitor. Ezra Pound, who was a major American poet and expatriate, was jailed for years for doing propaganda work for the Italian fascists during WWII, and the charge was treason. Jane, of course, betrayed her country to a "correct" enemy, so she got off scot-free. Standards are different, you see. But hey, Hanoi Jane remains a prime example of the leftist anti-American Hollywood cretin who presumes to be both morally superior and untouchable--which, alas, is half right.

  • asombra

    And you know why Fonda "dared" to pull her Vietnam stunt? Because she sensed she'd get away with it and even gain from it, at least with her target audience. If the social climate had been significantly different, she would have been far more circumspect, if not gung-ho patriotic like movie stars were during WWII. I believe it's called opportunism, among other things.