Camille Paglia on the Rush kerfuffle

This is a barn-burner, folks, and it comes from one of their own:

President Obama — in whom I still have great hope and confidence — has been ill-served by his advisors and staff. Yes, they have all been blindsided and overwhelmed by the crushing demands of the presidency. But I continue to believe in citizen presidents, who must learn by doing, even in a perilous age of terrorism. Though every novice administration makes blunders and bloopers, its modus operandi should not be a conspiratorial reflex cynicism.

Case in point: The orchestrated attack on radio host Rush Limbaugh, which has made the White House look like an oafish bunch of drunken frat boys. I returned from carnival in Brazil (more on that shortly) to find the Limbaugh affair in full flower. Has the administration gone mad? This entire fracas was set off by the president himself, who lowered his office by targeting a private citizen by name. Limbaugh had every right to counterattack, which he did with gusto. Why have so many Democrats abandoned the hallowed principle of free speech? Limbaugh, like our own liberal culture hero Lenny Bruce, is a professional commentator who can be as rude and crude as he wants.

Yes, I cringe when Rush plays his “Barack the Magic Negro” satire or when he gratuitously racializes the debate over Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, who is a constant subject of withering scrutiny for quite different reasons on sports shows here in Philadelphia. On the other hand, I totally agree with Rush about “feminazis,” whose amoral tactics and myopic worldview I as a dissident feminist had to battle for decades. As a student of radio and a longtime listener of Rush’s show, I have gotten a wealth of pleasure and insight from him over the years. To attack Rush Limbaugh is to attack his audience — and to intensify the loyalty of his fan base.

If Rush’s presence looms too large for the political landscape, it’s because of the total vacuity of the Republican leadership, which seems to be in a dithering funk. Rush isn’t responsible for the feebleness of Republican voices or the thinness of Republican ideas. Only ignoramuses believe that Rush speaks for the Republican Party. On the contrary, Rush as a proponent of heartland conservatism has waged open warfare with the Washington party establishment for years.

And I’m sick of people impugning Rush’s wealth and lifestyle, which is no different from that of another virtuoso broadcaster who hit it big — Oprah Winfrey. Rush Limbaugh is an embodiment of the American dream: He slowly rose from obscurity to fame on the basis of his own talent and grit. Every penny Rush has earned was the result of his rapport with a vast audience who felt shut out and silenced by the liberal monopoly of major media. As a Democrat and Obama supporter, I certainly do not agree with everything Rush says or does. I was deeply upset, for example, by the sneering tone both Rush and Sean Hannity took on Inauguration Day, when partisan politics should have been set aside for a unifying celebration of American government and history. Nevertheless, I respect Rush for his independence of thought and his always provocative news analysis. He doesn’t run with the elite — he goes his own way.

President Obama should yank the reins and get his staff’s noses out of slash-and-burn petty politics. His own dignity and prestige are on the line. If he wants a second term, he needs to project a calmer perspective about the eternal reality of vociferous opposition, which is built into our democratic system. Right now, the White House is starting to look like Raphael’s scathing portrait of a pampered, passive Pope Leo X and his materialistic cardinals — one of the first examples of an artist sending a secret, sardonic message to posterity. Do those shifty, beady-eyed guys needing a shave remind you of anyone? Yes, it’s bare-knuckles Chicago pugilism, transplanted to Washington. The charitably well-meaning but hopelessly extravagant Leo X, by the way, managed to mishandle the birth of the Protestant Reformation, which permanently split Christianity. [My emphasis]

These liberal guttersnipes should better think twice before going after Paglia. She is a towering intellect.

5 thoughts on “Camille Paglia on the Rush kerfuffle”

  1. I like Camille Paglia. And I’m glad she complained here about the selective indignation against Rush, when there’s none against Oprah.
    But there are some bloopers in this excerpt.
    Obama may be being ill served by his advisers, but they are not the reason he may not get a second term. If he is not reelected, it will be because of his idiotic unstimulating and unbelievable overspending as he tries to ram things down our throats that we do not need nor ask for and his attempts at socializing this country every chance he gets. It will be because of the horrendous list of cabinet choices like Geithner or Freeman, and the many others who are hellbent on helping him socialize us.
    I am glad Ms. Paglia thinks it’s wrong to target a private citizen by name, but where has she been? This is routine for this crowd, from Joe the Plumber to anyone who tries to say a word against any idea Obama proposes.
    And can we please put to rest the untruth that Rush racialized the debate over McNabb? All Rush said was what other commentators said and what many of us know, that we are all so anxious to have a black quarterback succeed that sometimes we may over praise him. There is nothing shocking or untrue about that statement.

  2. I’ve just read Camille’s piece when I saw it posted at DR, because I, too, do enjoy her intellect and ferocious command of the language. She’s been a Rush fan for many years; it was via his newsletter that I first discovered her ~ one of the few liberals who gets real from time to time.

    But intellectual brilliance doesn’t equal common sense; for all her “smarts and letters,” she’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer: still mesmerized by the election and fawning all over the Messiah, she’s quick to lay the blame for Obama’s failures on his staff. Huh???

    How Clintonian. Maybe Camille and MSNBC get the same memo; they sure sound alike. Obama can do no wrong, he still walks on water and will surely raise the dead over the next 4 years, if he’d just get rid of his fumbling WH entourage.

    Displacing blame is an old trick. Check out the Garden of Eden, Camille (Adam pointing the finger at “the woman You gave me”); and I agree with the pundits who’ve nailed Obama’s PR machine for picking a fight with Rush to divert attention from a pathetic novice who’s fast and furiously taking the economy – indeed, the country – into the tank.

  3. I’ve liked Camille ever since she said this over 10 years ago:
    “I believe that government should confine itself to the public realm and that it should be as stripped down as possible, within reason. It should not be burdened by excess bureaucracy. ”
    And she loved Sarah Palin’s speech, too.

Comments are closed.