The Cuban Exile Experience

The National Review’s Mario Loyola articulates the Cuban exile experience so concisely that even the Washington Post and the Dallas Morning News would be able to understand it. Of course, it would require that those newspapers have at least a smidgen of desire to understand, which obviously neither of them have.

[…] It’s no surprise that liberal papers such as the Dallas Morning News now think they’re in some position to judge which families are truly exiles and which aren’t. It was liberal papers — particularly the New York Times — that originally built Castro up into an international hero and persisted in romanticizing him long after he offered Cuba’s young men to the Kremlin as a Third World army. It was liberal papers that blamed the U.S. embargo for the economic catastrophe into which Castro plunged Cuba. It was liberal newspapers that helped to occlude the unspeakable daily abuses of Castro’s regime beneath the fantasy of a romantic nationalist who was bravely willing to stand up to imperialism.

“There is power,” the Dallas Morning News tells us, “in linking your past and your future to this unending struggle [against Fidel]. But because the fathers of both these men [Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio] migrated several years before the revolution, as is now clear, the link is at best a stretch. In the case of Cruz, the situation is even more complicated because his father originally supported Castro.” What utter nonsense. It would be offensive if the editors actually had any idea what they were talking about. No Cuban exile would for a second say that the Rubio and Cruz families were any less exile than anyone else. All of our families lost their homeland. That some were already here when it happened is irrelevant — nobody meant to forsake Cuba by coming here. We lost Cuba because Castro took it from us, from all of us, born and unborn, both here and back there.

Among Cuban-Americans, having been an early supporter of Castro in no way diminishes your anti-Communist credentials. On the contrary, it is the typical story for almost every family. Virtually all of our families opposed the dictatorship of Batista. Virtually all of our families believed Castro’s rhetoric of democracy and liberty. The first thing everyone hated about him was his evident relish in betraying his most ardent supporters. That was the first of many very personal reasons he would give us to hate him, reasons that only we can really understand.

What makes us exiles is not merely the fact that our families can’t go back to Cuba. It is that Castro wantonly ruined the land that our families grew up in, the land of our forefathers, and now that land exists only in the fading black-and-white pictures and memories of the happy childhoods of a generation that is dying now. Compared with that, what possible difference could it make that our grandparents arrived one year and not another? Senator Rubio didn’t know exactly what year his father first got here because it doesn’t matter.

Read his entire piece HERE.

2 thoughts on “The Cuban Exile Experience”

  1. Yes, yes, but Mr. Loyola is one of “those people.” You know how they are. Or at least Bill Clinton knows. Case closed.

  2. True, he’s one of those people, also, we cannot believe anything that’s published in the National Review or any such publication with those leanings. If its a Cuba topic, we can only believe non-Cuban experts* [such as Julia Sweig] reporting in news outlets like MSNBC, CNN, Time and Newsweek or of course, The New York Times.

    *The only Cuban-born Cuba experts we can believe are “rational” people Saladrigas and Lisandro Perez.

Comments are closed.