Galway Advertiser publishes Carlos Eire letter on Ché memorial The Irish Times refused to print

The controversy over a proposed monument to mass murderer Ernesto “Ché” Guevara in Galway, Ireland continues brewing. Today, the Galway Advertiser printed a letter written by our own Dr. Carlos Eire denouncing the monument. The interesting thing here is that this letter was originally written and sent to the Irish Times in response to a letter they published on March 5th by Jim Fitzpatrick, an artist involved in the design of the proposed Ché memorial in Galway.

The Irish Times, however, ignored it and refused to publish the rebuttal from Dr. Eire. Instead, they opted to leave Fitzpatrick’s grossly and ridiculously inaccurate account of Che’s life as the last word in their paper regarding this controversy.

Here are a couple of gems from Fitzpatrick’s missive in the Irish Times:

“I have a copy of the Jon Lee Anderson book which I am quite happy to lend to Mr Ganley if he wishes to acquaint himself with the facts and the truth about Che Guevara, one of the greatest heroes of our times – and a man full of faults like the rest of us.”

* * *

“Che also died for the poor, the disenfranchised, the dispossessed and the exploited, when he could so easily have enjoyed his comfortable life in government and done nothing. Instead he sacrificed his life for others.”

Thankfully, the Galway Advertiser is willing to allow the truth to be told in this controversy, and luckily, we have outstanding individuals like Dr. Carlos Eire willing to step up and speak that truth.

Dr. Eire’s letter in the Galway Advertiser is not available online as of yet, but a scanned copy of the published letter can be seen HERE, and below is the text:

Dear editors:

As a victim of Che Guevara’s atrocities, as a historian, and as a Cuban of Irish descent, I am deeply disturbed by the fact that the city of Galway is planning to erect a monument to Ernesto “Che” Guevara.  I don’t mind one bit if those behind this monstrous project want to believe lies – that’s their right in a truly free society – but it would be wrong to allow their abysmal ignorance or wilful blindness to stand unchallenged.  Those who think highly of Che may be surprised to hear it, but they have way too much in common with Holocaust deniers.

Che was my neighbor in Havana, and I actually saw him in the flesh several times.  He lived in an opulent mansion just a few blocks from my very small house, and also ran the prison of La Cabaña, where some of my relatives ended up being tortured and murdered.  Their crime?  Voicing an opinion different from Che’s. Or, in the case of my uncle, simply having a son who voiced an opinion contrary to Che’s.  The awful truth about  Ernesto “Che” Guevara is that he was a violent thug with despotic tendencies.  Che’s admirers prefer to think of him as a righteous warrior, and often cite certain books that portray him as a saint.  I hate to break the news to them: Some books are full of lies.  Fortunately, others are not, like the memoir Cuba 1959, La Galera de la Muerte, written by Javier Arzuaga, the priest who accompanied all of Che’s victims to the firing squad during the first nine months of the so-called Revolution. Read it and weep, please, all of you who love Che.  We Cubans are the only people on earth who knew the real Che – as opposed to the icon stamped on all sorts of merchandise – but there are many in the world who tune us out, discredit our testimony, and would love to gag us.  Somehow, the lie is preferable.


Ignorance and blind faith.  To praise Che, one must overlook mountains of evidence concerning his crimes.  But why would anyone do that, willingly? Because some people –especially those who see all of history as nothing but class struggle –  need a saint to venerate, someone who they think embodies the cause of the downtrodden. Ironically, though most Che lovers tend not to admit it, they act very much like religious zealots: as they prefer to see it, Che was a saintly crusader for the poor, so everything he did must have been good, and anyone harmed by him must have deserved it.  So what if he killed Cubans willy-nilly, without trials, including plenty of poor peasants?  Or helped establish one of the most repressive regimes on earth?  Or built concentration camps for dissidents and gays, including one with a sign over the front gate that read “Work will make real men out of you”?   It’s what needed to be done.  It was just. And in this warped religious view of Che the idol, and of politics in general, we who call that false history into question are worse than heretics.  We are the unjust cretins who still deserve to be killed by the likes of Che.

Everyone in Galway and Ireland should know this: Che has a lot in common with Oliver Cromwell.  Like Cromwell, Che proclaimed himself a liberator and felt justified in committing thousands of atrocities in a land other than his own, all in the name of a higher cause.  Like Cromwell, Che stole everyone’s property too, for a sacred purpose.  As for reputation: Cromwell received plenty of good press and adulation from those on his side, just like Che.  To Cromwell’s admirers – and he had plenty who would eagerly build him monuments – the Irish people were inconsequential obstacles to a higher goal, or worse, despicable papist wretches who deserved no mercy.

Allow me to propose a radical solution to this controversy: if Galway wants to honor Che with a monument, it should also build one for Cromwell, right next to it.  It’s only fair.

Carlos M. N. Eire
T. Lawrason Riggs Professor of History and Religious Studies
Yale University

6 thoughts on “Galway Advertiser publishes Carlos Eire letter on Ché memorial The Irish Times refused to print”

  1. Superb letter, which is why it was not published by the Irish Times. But the truth will out, sooner or later.

  2. As I’ve noted, it’s curious how people traditionally seen as very conservative, like the Irish and the Spanish, will try to overcompensate for such an unfashionable image by going to the opposite pole and becoming trendier-than-thou. It’s rather pitiful, given the underlying insecurity and desperate need to be “correct,” but there it is. Sadly, even certain Cubans fall into that trap.

Comments are closed.