As predictable as a soiled diaper on a newborn baby

Yeah. Groovy. So Cool.  So predictable.   The New York Times has found yet another excuse to play one of its favorite broken records.

Yeah.  It looks as if the last little iceberg left behind by the Cold War is thawing.   Or at least it looks like the New York Times would dearly wish for this to be true.  Yeah, baby, don’t you know that things are improving so much in Castrolandia that the embargo/blockade is now up for a serious review?  Yeah, that’s the way it should be, because that is what nearly every Times-reading intellectual so dearly desires, no matter what the real circumstances may be?  Dissidents in prison?  No internet for anyone?   Grinding poverty for all?  So what, baby?  The most important thing is bringing up any excuse, no matter how flimsy, to claim — with authority — that things are just as you want them to be, regardless of all evidence to the contrary.  Cool.  Oh, it is so wonderful to be a genuine intellectual, and to have the Times to tell us superior folk the news as it should be, rather than as it is for all inferior folk !

Easing of Restraints in Cuba Renews Debate on U.S. Embargo

By DAMIEN CAVE
Published: November 19, 2012

HAVANA — “If I could just get a lift,” said Francisco López, imagining the addition of a hydraulic elevator as he stood by a rusted Russian sedan in his mechanic’s workshop here. All he needed was an investment from his brother in Miami or from a Cuban friend there who already sneaks in brake pads and other parts for him.

The problem: Washington’s 50-year-old trade embargo, which prohibits even the most basic business dealings across the 90 miles separating Cuba from the United States. Indeed, every time Mr. López’s friend in Florida accepts payment for a car part destined for Cuba, he puts himself at risk of a fine of up to $65,000.

With Cuba cautiously introducing free-market changes that have legalized hundreds of thousands of small private businesses over the past two years, new economic bonds between Cuba and the United States have formed, creating new challenges, new possibilities — and a more complicated debate over the embargo.

The longstanding logic has been that broad sanctions are necessary to suffocate the totalitarian government of Fidel and Raúl Castro. Now, especially for many Cubans who had previously stayed on the sidelines in the battle over Cuba policy, a new argument against the embargo is gaining currency — that the tentative move toward capitalism by the Cuban government could be sped up with more assistance from Americans.

Even as defenders of the embargo warn against providing the Cuban government with “economic lifelines,” some Cubans and exiles are advocating a fresh approach. The Obama administration already showed an openness to engagement with Cuba in 2009 by removing restrictions on travel and remittances for Cuban Americans. But with Fidel Castro, 86, retired and President Raúl Castro, 81, leading a bureaucracy that is divided on the pace and scope of change, many have begun urging President Obama to go further and update American policy by putting a priority on assistance for Cubans seeking more economic independence from the government.

“Maintaining this embargo, maintaining this hostility, all it does is strengthen and embolden the hard-liners,” said Carlos Saladrigas, a Cuban exile and co-chairman of the Cuba Study Group in Washington, which advocates engagement with Cuba. “What we should be doing is helping the reformers.”

Any easing would be a gamble. Free enterprise may not necessarily lead to the embargo’s goal of free elections, especially because Cuba has said it wants to replicate the paths of Vietnam and China, where the loosening of economic restrictions has not led to political change. Indeed, Cuban officials have become adept at using previous American efforts to soften the embargo to their advantage, taking a cut of dollars converted into pesos and marking up the prices at state-owned stores.

And Cuba has a long history of tossing ice on warming relations. The latest example is the jailing of Alan Gross, a State Department contractor who has spent nearly three years behind bars for distributing satellite telephone equipment to Jewish groups in Havana.

Continue reading here, but prepare adequately with a wide array of barfing receptacles.

3 thoughts on “As predictable as a soiled diaper on a newborn baby”

  1. New York Times is–as you say, Dr. Eire–very predictable. It doesn’t matter that these so-called economic reforms are nothing more than a variation on the same theme. Cuba has dabbled in the past with [example] farmer’s markets and independent restaurants only to repeal laws permitting these endeavors and/or institute onerous regulations that intentionally spell failure for the business owners. And how can buying land overrun by marabou weed that essentially renders it unusable make it a genuine reform, or buying an unaffordable house worth over $100,000 make it a tenable prospect for the average Cuban making under $20.00 a month? I could go on and on about these false reforms and token changes. The point is that the New York Times knows all of this, but of course, as you point out, their intention is other. The Old Gray Hussy has been chilling for castro since Herbert Matthews and they are not going to stop now. They want the embargo lifted and they are not going to allow something as inconvenient as the truth stand in their way! Besides, we are in the middle of one of a pro-castro blitzkrieg and the New York Times is joining in with other major publications such as National Geographics. This is a well-orchestrated campaign. We usually have a 3 or 4 a year.

  2. The NYT is not a newspaper. It’s a leftist propaganda organ, which it practically always has been. Anyone who does not see its blatant bias and relentless agenda-pushing simply does not want to see it, or is mentally defective. It is not possible to respect anyone who takes the NYT at face value. And it’s not just the bias, but the arrogance, the insufferable smugness, the utterly unfounded air of superiority and primacy–in other words, the hubris. It is a frankly perverse entity that will manipulate the news any way it feels will advance its interests. It is, in fact, an abomination.

Comments are closed.