WHOOPS!–CNN’s (secret) business links to the Castro Regime!

CNN’s Havana Cuck-reporter Patrick Oppmann recently denounced Trump’s Cuba policy as a conflict of interest; 

“…the decision to prohibit business with GAESA (Cuba’s military-controlled business empire) ….is an example of Trump’s ability to impact his business’ competitors while in the White House. Trump’s prohibition, in effect, puts other hotel companies on equal footing with his personal company — not allowed to pursue future business in Cuba.”

In brief, according to CNN’s Patrick Oppmann, Trump’s Cuba policy simply sandbags other hotel companies who might get a head start on Trump’s hotel company. In brief:  a blatant “conflict of interest.”

And speaking of conflicts of interest:

CNN’s Cuba reporter Patrick Oppmann  specializes in denouncing any U.S. (especially Trump’s) restrictions on U.S. tourist travel to Cuba–Yet CNN’s  Cuba reporter Patrick Oppmann’s wife owns a business in Cuba that caters primarily to U.S. tourists.

And speaking of conflicts of interest:

CNN’s Cuba reporter Patrick Oppmann also specializes in denouncing any U.S. policy attempt to prevent American businessmen from partnering with the Castro regime–Yet CNN’s  Cuba reporter Patrick Oppman’s wife is a high-rolling consultant for a firm that specializes in helping foreign businessman partner with the Castro regime.

 

 

“Humberto’s book is a very valuable book-a book badly needed around the world.” (Former Chairwoman of the House Committee on Foreign Relations Ileana Ros-Lehtinen R. Fl)

“Even here in Poland many people were duped into believing the myth of Che Guevara. After reading Fontova’s excellent book, they will have have no excuse.” (Tomaz Pompowski, Polska Times,–division of The London Times– Warsaw, Poland)

“I read it (Fontova’s book) in two sittings–I couldn’t put it down!”(Mark Levin.)

hannitygif3chevidgif

Le ZZZUMBA!!!  

1 thought on “WHOOPS!–CNN’s (secret) business links to the Castro Regime!”

  1. Conflicts of interest, like hypocrisy, are only considered wrong for right-wing or conservative types. Leftists are considered inherently justified no matter what they do–as in the ends (real or not) justify the means. I believe it’s called a racket, or a crock, but again, that’s OK for leftists. Anything is OK for leftists–ask any of them, or rather, watch them operate. It’s not as if they’re even subtle about it.

Comments are closed.