President Frenk meets with Castrophiles of UM faculty, reassures them they can continue cozying up to King Raul if they wish to do so

No problem, Castrophiles!

We warned you here at Babalu that there would be plenty of loopholes in the “agreement” reached between UM president Julio Frenk and anti-Castro Cuban exiles on August 18.

Well, here is the first of many loopholes to be revealed publicly.

Individual faculty at UM can continue to deal with the Castro regime.

President Frenk told Castrophile faculty at UM that he was only blocking “institutional”- level cooperation with Castro, Inc.’s tightly-controlled university system.

“Individual” partnering with institutions of Castro, Inc. will be perfectly okay.

How the difference will be parsed between “institutional” and “individual” remains to be seen, especially since UM faculty will be free to “pursue agreements with Cuban colleagues and institutions as they see fit” (see article below).

What?  Say that again, please…

Yes, UM will not deal with institutions of Castro, Inc. “institutionally,” but UM faculty are free to do so, “individually.”

Wow.  Guiness Book of World Records, please take note, in your prevarication section, and cross-list that entry in your obfuscation category.

This means that agents of the Castro Ministry of Truth will be free to visit UM as frequently as any UM professor wants to have them as guests.  And vice-versa, and many other such things… especially after ICCAS gets a new Castrophile director and staff, which, of course, is as inevitable as the earth’s spin.

Stay tuned for more loophole revelations and other such unsurprising fine details about the inevitably Castro-friendly future of the Institute for Cuban and Cuban American Studies at UM.

Concerned Castrophiles at UM

From Inside Higher Education:

A group of faculty members at the University of Miami whose research or teaching relates to Cuba met with President Julio Frenk on Tuesday to discuss the university’s recent announcement that it would not enter into institutional agreements with the Cuban government or its universities. The announcement was made following a meeting between Frenk and leaders of local Cuban exile groups, leading faculty and others to express concern that the university was allowing outside organizations to drive its intellectual agenda.

In an interview, Frenk said he emphasized to faculty members that individual scholarly exchanges with Cuba will continue.

“The University of Miami already has a very vigorous series of joint projects with Cuban colleagues,” Frenk said. ”I made very clear in the meeting with the exiles that the university would continue to facilitate those exchanges.”

“The only thing that we are not planning to do is to have at the institutional level, a university level, a formal memorandum of understanding.” The reason for that, Frenk said, is because the university does not want to condone or legitimize a nondemocratic regime that violates human rights. He said the desire for the university to engage with Cuba without legitimizing its government arose as areas of “consensus” in listening sessions about Cuba he held with faculty and Cuban-American community members shortly after his inauguration as president in 2016:

“I made an impassionate defense of academic freedom,” Frenk said. “Because of academic freedom I would never stop a faculty member from the University of Miami from collaborating with any colleague anywhere in the world, but I want our institutional agreements to be held to the same standard. Unfortunately today because of the lack of autonomy Cuban universities do not enjoy academic freedom,” said Frenk.

The six faculty members who attended the meeting issued a joint statement about it.

“The gathered faculty expressed multiple concerns about the recent Cuba policy statement, its perceived political motivations, and its potential to impact adversely the ability of faculty to pursue their research freely,” said the statement, which was signed by Victor Deupi, a lecturer in architecture; J. Tomas Lopez, a professor and chair of the art and art history department; Lillian Manzor, an associate professor and chair of the modern languages and literatures department; William J. Pestle, an associate professor of anthropology and director of the Latin American Studies Program; Kate Ramsey, an associate professor of history; and Tanya L. Zakrison, an associate professor of surgery.

“While the gathered faculty remain concerned with some aspects of the statement, and its origins, they were heartened to hear the administration’s defense of the faculty’s unfettered ability to: travel to Cuba, continue to work with Cuban colleagues on the island and in Miami, teach about Cuba, pursue agreements with Cuban colleagues and institutions, and carry out research as they see fit,” the statement says. “Furthermore, the faculty representatives welcomed the administration’s defense of the fundamental independence of critical academic inquiry and its assurance that faculty would be protected from undue outside interference with said work. The faculty present look forward to working more closely with the administration in the future as the University of Miami seeks to position itself as a leader in the study of Cuba and the Caribbean, and they were reassured that this process would take place in a way that privileges and protects academic freedom and international collaboration.”

Let me see the fine print…
Did someone say “academic integrity?”?

4 thoughts on “President Frenk meets with Castrophiles of UM faculty, reassures them they can continue cozying up to King Raul if they wish to do so”

  1. I must say, this is so classic it really should get some kind of award for excellence in speciousness. Frenk doesn’t belong at UM, but at the UN–which is not a compliment. And to think Cuban-Americans actually believed they could deal with this guy in good faith and get somewhere worthwhile…Well, I suppose it makes for good theater, of sorts. It’s even funny, in a twisted and perverse way. And of course, the clamoring academics (three of whom are Cuban American–surprise!) no doubt presume to know better, far better, than “those people.” Again, classic. Lord, the disgust.

  2. Note that the three academics of Cuban extraction officially participating in this, uh, protest include Victor Deupi, the president of the Cintas Foundation, recently in the news for, uh, normalizing Cintas scholarships to include artists living in Cuba (the other two are Lillian Manzor and J. Tomás López). Isn’t it nice that precisely half of the, uh, dissenters are at least technically Cuban? And I thought the Herald people were unbeatable at this sort of, uh, balance. Hah!

  3. Alas, this is just same old shit, different day. What can one say that isn’t painfully obvious? Yes, the game is rigged so badly it’s a wonder any Cubans bother to play it–meaning “those people,” not the ones who play by the rules to ensure gain and avoid cost. The problem with, uh, pragmatism (to put it fairly kindly) is that all too often it does not allow for dignity, assuming that even matters to the pragmatists.

    I cannot get out of my head the story of how the exiled José Martí would not enter a New York theater to see a beautiful Spanish dancer because he’d have to pass under a Spanish flag to get in. Such scrupulous dignity (when it’s genuine and not an act) is never the norm, but it is light years away from the disgraceful Cubanoid spectacles to which we have sadly become accustomed. Of course, Martí was not normal.

    Maybe I just need to play some Buena Vista tunes by the Portuondo woman and drink some Havana Club rum. Or maybe I should go back to my detached “neutral” phase, which was reasonable enough but neither here nor there. Sometimes I get so tired of being Cuban it feels like a very bad joke.

Comments are closed.