“The Cuban people are incredible people. They support me very strongly.” (Donald Trump, Camp David, Dec. 17.)

“Hopefully everything will normalize with Cuba, but right now, they are not doing the right thing. And when they don’t do the right thing, we’re not going to do the right thing,” Trump said. “That’s all there is to it. We have to be strong with Cuba. The Cuban people are incredible people. They support me very strongly. But we’ll get Cuba straightened out.”

(Obviously the President was referring to Cuban-Americans, who in fact voted for him at a higher rate than even Red-State white (i.e. “deplorable”) Americans.)

“Every ethnic group except whites bloc-votes for Democrats.” (Ann Coulter Oct. 26, 2016)

As proof: According to exit polls last year:

“Whites” voted for Trump at the rate of 56 %.

Cuban-Americans voted for Trump at a rate of 58 % (probably higher, actually.)

“Latinos” voted for Hillary Clinton at a rate of  79 %

Indeed this habit of Cuban-Americans to vote (and generally behave) like “White-Americans” has held true for decades and causes immense exasperation among liberals.

Might there be a perfectly logical reason for it? Might Cuban-Americans be themselves –GULP!–mostly white!… Might this ghastly fact explain this hideously-politically-incorrect-conundrum!

Look– I’m not the one who started classifying Americans by ethnicity with regards to their voting habits, etc. Government and media busybodies (mostly liberals) started the practice. OK, fine. It’s a modern fact of life. So let’s live with it.

I’m just saying if they  insist on doing this type of thing for political polls, for the government census, for political discussions, etc–then at least do it accurately!

Instead of constantly employing the cumbersome term (from a wordsmith perspective ) “Non-Cuban-Hispanics” to  constantly qualify the exasperating (to liberals) political and social habits of Cuban-American–instead of this literary clumsiness–simply dump Cuban-Americans from the “Hispanic” or “Latino” classification altogether. OK?

Got it? Can we talk?


(Can we talk?!)

Instead include Cuban-American in the “White,” category, where they  belong by any quasi-rational definition of the term Caucasian.

“White” used to be synonymous with “Caucasian,” also meaning European. Spain is a nation in Europe comprising most of the Iberian Peninsula which was known as Hispania when part of the Roman Empire. This area of Europe was originally peopled mostly by Celtic tribes.

Unlike the rest of what came to be known as Latin America, when Columbus landed Cuba had a tiny indigenous population. Most of these hapless Native Americans quickly perished, mostly from disease also from brutalities by the settlers. So by the 1700 Cuba was populated overwhelmingly by Spaniards. Later African slaves were brought in to work the sugar plantations. But according to the UN in 1957 Cuba’s population was 71 % white.

Oh, I know…I know….For the crime of presenting these historical facts I’m about to be denounced as a “racist.” I can sense it. So here I’ll turn over the floor to a Marxist Mexican (that should cover most of the bases):

“Cuba has a tremendous advantage in national integration over other Latin American countries because of a largely homogeneous white Spanish immigrant base,” wrote UN economist (and Mexican Marxist) Juan Noyola who in 1960 was invited to Cuba by the island’s “Minister of Economics” Che Guevara. “Cuba’s smaller Negro population is also culturally integrated. Those feudal modes of labor that exist in the rest of Latin America, don’t exist in Cuba. The Cuban campesino does not resemble the one in the rest of Latin America The Cuban campesino, in all respects, is a modern man. They have an educational level and a familiarity with modern methods unseen in the rest of Latin America.”

Please don’t worry, liberals. You will still be able to bash Cuban-Americans for their exasperating political and social habits. But at least you’ll be doing it for the same reason you bash “southern whites” and other such “deplorables,” who really can’t help themselves  from acting like racists, sexists…blah..blah…blah. It’s all part of that despicable European heritage, you see.

This type of accurate  bashing would be a vast improvement (both scientifically and aesthetically) over constantly  implying that Cuban-Americans  constitute “traitors” to the “Latino” or “Hispanic” s (i.e Meso-Amerindian) political cause-of-the-week.

The term “traitor,” after all denotes more ugliness than the simple, “racist, sexist, homophobic…blah…blah…blah.

So PUH-LEEAZE!–once and for all!–we’re not “traitors!”We’re simply Americans of (mostly) European heritage who can’t help but vote and act like other Americans of (mostly) European heritage.

There. Somebody had to say it...y PAL CARAJO!


Above: The lady on the left has a perfectly English name. Yet she is not classified as an “Anglo” and nobody expects her to vote (and otherwise behave) exactly like the gentleman on the right.  Each person is correctly recognized as belonging to a different ethnic group from the other.


Yet the gentleman on the left ( because he has a Spanish last name, Fontova) is known as a “Hispanic” and is expected to behave (politically, culturally, etc.) EXACTLY like the gentleman on the right, (who also has a Spanish last name, Lopez.)

Given modern American education, it doesn’t seem to occur to most American pundits, pollsters, opinion-shapers, etc. that each of these gentlemen–though they share ethnically-similar last names– belong to completely different ethnic groups with utterly different cultural and political habits.

The perfectly English name Washington, after all, is the “Blackest name in the U.S.” Yet the thousands upon thousnads of American blacks named Washington are not labeled as “Anglos.” Why then does a Spanish last name automatically make a Toltec, Maya or Aztec a “Hispanic?” In fact, many Americans of mostly Meso-Amerindian heritage themselves (quite understandably) object to this ethnographic idiocy. 

“Humberto wrote something that is TRUE! That is ethnically VALID! –So he’s obviously a RACIST!–A FASCIST!–PLEASE find us a SAFE-PLACE!!!”

“Humberto Fontova is a gifted polemicist who pulls no punches. A great service for liberty, justice and truth.” (The Weekly Standard  on Fidel; Hollywood’s Favorite Tyrant.)


“Humberto Fontova’s book teaches us truths about Castro’s island that are very discomfiting for many intellectuals.” Ana Botella (Spain’s former First Lady while giving a book reading in Madrid, upon “Fidel; HFT” release in Spain)



“Humberto is the REAL McCoy!–and when he and his lifelong blood-brothers unite for this voracious tooth, fang and claw orgy of righteous predator “killin and grillin” in his NEW CHRISTMAS ISSUE book!– they prove their is NO party like a BAYOU party!” (Ted Nugent.)

3 thoughts on ““The Cuban people are incredible people. They support me very strongly.” (Donald Trump, Camp David, Dec. 17.)”

  1. Yes, Humberto, it’s all perfectly reasonable, but good luck with that. And by the way, even if Cuban-Americans voted for Trump not at 58% but 68%, they should have voted for him (or rather, against the Clintons) at at least the same percentage as “Latinos” voted Dem. It’s not just that we shouldn’t be lumped with “Latinos,” but that we shouldn’t be playing the same game so many officially white Americans are playing. We should be above such weak-mindedness, to put it kindly–it’s the least we owe to our history.

  2. And for what it’s worth, even Ann Coulter apparently does not consider someone like Marco Rubio to be white, so as I said, Humberto, good luck with that.

  3. As I have often said, all of this racialization of Hispanics began with radical chicanos in the 1970s who wanted to piggyback on the affirmative action advances of Afro-Americans and were upset because whenever a chicano committed a crime, the newspapers would ID him as Mexican American and this was having a detrimental effect on the image of Mexican Americans. In order to get affirmative action and stop newspapers from identifying Mexican American criminals as such, a Mexican-American congressman successfully passed a law that the Census Department stop identifying Hispancis by our nation of birth and instead identify us by the all-inclusive “Hispanic.” So, by starting the brown power movement, distancing themselves from Spain and insisting that the Census Department stop calling Hispanics by our nation of birth or ancestry, but instead call us all by the all-inclusive “Hispanic” which involved into “Latino” when more radical chicanos argued that “Hispanic” was too reminiscent of Spain and “we” [because they claim that they can speak for all of us] are not Europeans, we became unequivocally non-white even if our grandparents on all four sides came from Europe. This stupidity has gotten so entrenched in the American psyche that I have even read articles where someone as phenotypically white as Ted Cruz [who was described as Irish-looking by Christ Matthews] is called non-white! What’s more, some articles have even argued that Desi Arnaz who was seen as white by 1950’s America [even below the Mason-Dixon line] is not-white, so that “I Love Lucy” was the first interracial program on American TV!

    By the way, if you go to Latino Rebels on Facebook, the chicanos there are always calling Cubans like Marco Rubio [who is the descendant of Asturian immigrants to Cuba] coconuts [brown on the outside, white on the inside] and traitors because most of us don’t wholeheartedly and unequivocally support uncontrolled immigration from Mexico. Their arrogance is mind-boggling. Not only do they strip us of our identity, but we are slandered and labled “traitors,” for not supporting their agenda.

    Regarding Ann Coulter, she’s a bigot.

Comments are closed.