Cuba’s Castro dictatorship should be put back on State Sponsors of Terrorism list

The Obama administration had no reason to take Cuba’s Castro dictatorship off the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. The Cuban regime never stopped supporting terrorist nations and terrorist groups throughout the world and continue to do so to this day. But Obama went ahead and took them off the list anyway, adding yet another concession to a long list of concessions the U.S. gave Cuba in exchange for absolutely nothing.

Today, experts are calling on the Trump administration to return the terror-sponsoring Castro regime to the list.

Karl Herchenroeder in PJ Media:

U.S. Should Return Cuba to Terror List, Experts Say

President Trump should further unwind President Obama’s directives on Cuba and once again designate the communist nation as a state sponsor of terrorism, a panel of Cuban and diplomatic experts told Congress last week.

The panel included Cuban-born U.S. Ambassador to Venezuela under George H.W. Bush Otto Reich, Heritage Foundation analyst Ana Quintana and the Cuban Studies Institute’s Jaime Suchlicki.

Quintana argued that Cuba never met the standard to be removed from the State Department list in the first place. Reich agreed, saying that when Obama moved to normalize relations with Cuba in 2014 he ordered a “preordained” review of Cuba’s designation.

“That was not a serious (State Department) review,” Reich said during a hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security, which was held at Miami Dade College.

The experts repeatedly pointed to the alleged acoustic attacks against some two dozen U.S. diplomats and their families in Havana in 2017, as well as the Castro regime’s ties to two of the four state sponsors of terrorism, Iran and North Korea.

Obama in December 2014 removed the designation, loosened restrictions on travel and business for Americans in Cuba and visited the communist island himself. In exchange for the policy shift, the U.S. gained the return of two American citizen detainees and the release of at least 53 Cuban prisoners.

The Trump administration in November reversed the normalization process by restricting travel and business dealings in Cuba, including limits on relationships with entities linked to the Cuban military.

Quintana said that Obama never certified that Cuba doesn’t have the capability to conduct terrorist actions in the future, and Reich said that the alleged acoustic attacks, which remain a mystery, should be characterized as terror attacks. The panel agreed that the Cuban government at least knew about the attacks, if it didn’t outright direct them.

“Where was the legal justification for Cuba’s removal (from the list)?” Quintana asked.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) sat in during the House hearing, where he argued that U.S.-Cuba policy should further American interests and values. He said that the Obama policies did neither.

“It is not in our national interest to have an anti-Israeli, anti-American, pro-Iranian and pro-Putin dictatorial regime 90 miles from our shores,” Rubio said. “The opening to Cuba did absolutely nothing to transition to a different type of government, much less a democratic one. On the contrary, it created the space for at least a symbolic transition that the Cuban government will try to appear to make look normal when it is in fact not.”

Continue reading HERE.