Cuba, prostituted, between London and Moscow

Rafaela Cruz via Diario de Cuba:

Cuba, prostituted, between London and Moscow

Castroism is now accelerating the transition from a supposedly socialist dictatorship to a supposedly capitalist one, with Russian counsel and control.

The fact that Castroism would like to adopt the “Russian model” is obvious, as it seems to constitute a stable formula mixing a largely liberalized economy with discreetly privatized strategic state sectors, such as Banking, Communications and heavy and extractive industries, all under a dictatorial government that is only technically accountable, having legal mechanisms to concentrate and perpetuate itself in power.

Cuba, however, lacks what renders the Russian model viable: a productive sector (in Russia, hydrocarbons) providing the Government with sufficient revenue so that it can, without losing power, liberate the rest of the economy while having resources to cover every dictatorship’s overhead: propaganda, repression, bureaucracy and loot to give out to avert power struggles in the leadership.

With the sugar industry destroyed, only tourism could be, for Castroism, what hydrocarbons are for Vladimir Putin, but even after years of investing at an irrational pace in hotels, which has decapitalized the country’s agricultural and industrial production, they have not managed to turn tourism into that pivotal sector, nor will this be achieved as long as Americans cannot freely vacation in Cuba.

Let us recall that under Raúl Castro a diplomatic thaw with Washington was achieved, coming to an end with Donald Trump, aborted by Fidel Castro himself and hardliners still found in the CCP and the Armed Forces. It is hardly bold to surmise Raul was hoping that, eventually, the embargo would be relaxed, at which point tourism to the largest of the Antilles would explode, but that never happened.

As they await such an outcome they have been buying time with economic reforms that, for the most part, are just smoke and mirrors to instill hope in the people and convince them that they are doing things differently from Fidel, in a tacit recognition that it was he who got Cuba into this mess. Other reform measures have been maneuvers involving displacements of national revenue against small self-employed companies, which were flourishing until 2019.

Only recently, with the situation hitting rock bottom, and after the national uprising on 11J, did they begin to introduce partial liberalizations, such as the MSME law, which is, actually, a first step towards the remote-controlled privatization demanded by the Russian model.

Continue reading HERE.

1 thought on “Cuba, prostituted, between London and Moscow”

  1. The Russian model appeared to be the most open but it turned out to be the worst. The Chinese / Vietnamese model openly maintained their communistic system but it worked economic miracles.

    Cuba does not have rich resources nor heavy industry but neither did China. China in 1979 was as poor as Cuba. They released the controls on the economy and things took off.

    It that too difficult to understand? Are all Cuban leaders morons?

Comments are closed.