Strange time to order a raid

According to some pundits, President Biden concluded a great week, from a jobs report to lower gas prices and some new legislation.  They were also proclaiming that the red wave may be smaller than expected.   

So what do you do in the early days of Joe’s “comeback”?  You raid President Trump’s home?  You order a raid just hours after signing a law that will add 87,000 IRS agents to look for tax cheats?  How many Uber drivers or small business owners had FBI nightmares last night?

The FBI had better find what they are looking for.  Otherwise, this may be the biggest blunder since Geraldo Rivera opened Al Capone’s sadly empty vault. It may totally backfire on the Trump haters.  This is from TIPP Insights:    

Where does the political persecution of Trump stop?

The Democrats are afraid of the rise of Trump. They are in the endless pursuit to legally stop Trump from running for the nation’s highest office in 2024. Having failed in their efforts to impeach him, they constituted the J6 select committee probe. And now, they have launched legal actions in multiple theaters, one in New York, the second in Georgia, and the third in D.C., hoping something would stick.

The nation’s law enforcement agencies under the Biden administration have set a remarkable course that, if not corrected, will undoubtedly lead to the country becoming a banana republic. Americans were stunned by the FBI’s treatment of Peter Navarro, who served as a top presidential advisor to Trump. The raid on Mar-A-Lago outdoes shackling Navarro with leg irons. It is no wonder Americans lack confidence in the DOJ and the FBI.

Who thought that raiding President Trump’s home was a good idea in such a polarized country?  It’s one thing to raid a narco’s estate or a mafia leader or a criminal on the run.   

My guess is that a decision of this type was made very close to the Oval Office if not President Biden himself.  It’s hard to believe that a local FBI office would take such a risk over documents that may or may not be found.

What happens if AG Merrick Garland swings and misses?  What if the documents are not there or don’t rise to the level of criminality that calls for an FBI raid?  Maybe Garland can watch the aforementioned Geraldo Rivera show.

P.S.  Check out my videos and posts. (My new American Thinker)

Maybe they’ll rename it China News Network

According to news reports, CNN is undergoing a ratings crisis and some profit concerns. This is the story:    

On Tuesday, the New York Times reported that CNN’s yearly profitability is expected to decline to $956.8 according to projections from S&P Global Market Intelligence.    

CNN’s annual profits haven’t sunk below $1 billion since 2016, the year Donald Trump beat Hilary Clinton in the presidential election and subsequently became a prominent figure in their commentary. “Ratings are down from their Trump-era heights across cable news, but declines at CNN are particularly pronounced,” the Times noted.

CNN viewership is about 639,000 in the prime time hours slot, which is down 27 percent from last year. More people on average watch MSNBC, whose viewership is down 23 percent, and Fox wins over both networks and is up about a percentage point in overall viewers.

Translation:  The bean counters are worried or they don’t have enough beans to count. So the executives are looking to diversify, as they say in business schools. They want to take the brand to China, according to the aforementioned story:      

CNN brought on Chris Marlin, a lawyer with no cable news experience, who suggested “striking advertising deals with major tech companies like Microsoft,” “…selling sponsorships to corporate underwriters,” and “extending CNN’s brand in China.”

To be honest, I don’t care because I don’t watch CNN. The story of CNN is easy to understand. They invested themselves totally in the anti-Trump meme and then the Orange Man left the front pages.  They have no one to hate anymore. They have to report on the Biden presidency and inflation, recession, etc. It was a lot more fun when Jim Acosta was sent to the press conferences to argue with President Trump. “Those were the days my friend, we thought they’d never end” is what the bean counters are singing over there.

So who knows hat the future holds for the “most trusted name in news.” Maybe the future is in China. If so then all they have to do is make it the China News Network. It all fits so neatly. They can move the headquarters from Atlanta to Peking and put a mask on all their correspondents to fight the pollution or whatever virus is happening over there.

P.S.  Check out  my videos  and posts.

(My new American Thinker post)

‘The View’ is unviewable

A few weeks ago, we discussed the television talk show “The View” in our Sunday after mass informal political roundtable.  It’s a bunch of friends who go out to lunch after church and engage in a variety of topics.   

Of course, every once in a while “The View” comes up. So one lady said that “The View” is unviewable, and we generally agreed. Maybe we learned this week why it is “unviewable” for so many.  Once again, Whoopi Goldberg decided to share her wisdom:  

“God doesn’t make mistakes” and thus it’s in his plan to have women choose abortion.  “God made us smart enough to know when it wasn’t going to work for us. That’s the beauty of giving us freedom of choice.”   “My relationship [with God] is always choppy,” she adds.

Well. I won’t comment on her “choppy” relationship with God.  However, I will say a bit about God and freedom of choice. Yes, God gave us the freedom to choose.  He also told us about right and wrong.  For example, I have the freedom to choose to attack an old woman walking home. I’m free to do that but I also know that it’s wrong and could land me in jail if I don’t live in New York or San Francisco.

Of course, it won’t matter because abortion is a sacrament for many in the left.  It’s all about giving women the right to choose but that apparently does not apply to the girls aborted.  I guess that they will never get the right to choose.  They are collateral damage in the pursuit of the goal.So “The View” will go on and it does not matter whether they have a conservative counterpart or not.  The show is about making outrageous statements that will create conversation or get clicks on social media.   So let the 2 million or so who watch it get their kicks! In the end, the best thing to do is to turn off the TV or watch the reruns of “The Dick Van Dyke Show.“   

At least, Laura Petrie, and her neighbor Millie Helper, made a lot more sense when they discussed the problems of the world.  Laura and Millie made you laugh whereas Whoopi and Joy make you wonder about what’s going on at ABC News.

P.S.:  Check out  my videos  and posts. (My new American Thinker post)

And Vince knew about socialism too!

We learned that Vince Scully passed away. He was 94 and retired from the microphone a few years ago. I remember a college professor who told me that the Dodgers had changed coasts, the letter on their cap from B to LA, and added the names of the players to the uniforms, but Vince Scully was always the voice of the team.

His story is remarkable, as Anthony Castrovince wrote:   

Though born in the Bronx, near Yankee Stadium, in that epochal year of 1927 and eventually associated with the Dodgers, Scully grew up a New York Giants fan. He would emulate the batting stance of his favorite player, Mel Ott. But as early as age 8, Scully knew that he wanted to announce games even more than he wanted to play in them.

Fordham-educated and Navy-trained, Scully got into broadcasting at just 22 years old, and he did so by making an impression on a man who had been a major influence. Scully was a fill-in at WTOP in Washington, D.C., when one day a message was left for him at his parents’ home. His mother relayed it.

“Red Skelton called!”

Actually, it was Red Barber, who was heading CBS network sports and looking for a backup voice for “College Football Roundup.”

And the rest is history, as they say.  He was a natural on the radio and eventually made it to the Brooklyn Dodgers.  

My memories of Vince Scully are about the post-season. I did not live in the Los Angeles area so  did not hear him call Dodgers’ games.  It was in the post-season when I heard his unique style of calling a baseball game.  Always had the feeling that Vince had scored a 100 on his grammar tests.  

I remember the 1974 World Series when the Dodgers played the Oakland A’s.  He was talking about players’ salaries and spoke about the new reality of the game.  He said something like the losers’ wives wear mink coats these days.  He meant that the losers would get a nice check, too.

Read more

Who knew we’d be talking about the misery index again?

As I recall, it was then Governor Jimmy Carter who used the misery index against President Gerald Ford in 1976. It was inflation plus unemployment equal the misery index. It was thrown back at President Carter in 1980 and had a lot to do with Ronald Reagan becoming the 40th president and bringing a lot of GOP senators with him.

The misery index is back and it will hurt the Democrats, according to Bloomberg:   

A new study by Bloomberg Economics takes one gauge with a knack of predicting ballot outcomes — the misery index, calculated by adding up the inflation and unemployment rates — and projects it forward through election day.   

The result: Based on past voting patterns, President Joe Biden’s party can expect to lose 30 to 40 seats in the House and a few in the Senate too, easily wiping out razor-thin Democratic majorities.

My sense is that the 2022 results will be driven by two factors: First, the misery index is real and people feel it every time that they fill their tank or buy food. And second, who will show up to vote this time?   

This is always hard to “poll” but my impression is that a lot people angry with President Biden plan to vote.  They are furious about a lot of things, from school curriculums to cabinet members who can’t seem to do anything about any problem. How you ever seen a less qualified group of people than those running the country?  Can you say Pete The Transportation man?

So it will be a good day for the GOP.  It looks that way with 90 days to go.  But don’t forget to vote!

P.S,  Check out  my videos  and posts. (My new American Thinker post)

The first report of the week does not go well for President Biden

As we know, this is the week of economic reports.  We will wait for the GDP number on Thursday, but the first one is not good news for the Biden administration. This is the summary:    

US consumer confidence declined in July to the lowest level since February 2021 on dimmer views of the economy amid persistent inflation.    

The Conference Board’s index decreased for a third month to 95.7 from a downwardly revised 98.4 reading in June, data Tuesday showed. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a decline to 97.    

The steady weakening in sentiment risks causing consumers to cut back on discretionary purchases at a time when the economy is struggling for momentum. Inflation has dented confidence and forced the Federal Reserve to pursue aggressive interest-rate hikes geared at curbing demand.

There you have it.  Honestly, did we need a report to confirm that?  We are all seeing with our own eyes and talking to neighbors and family about it. We can hear about layoffs and a softer job market.  It’s happening all around us and the report just confirms what we know firsthand. And to make matters worse, half of all Americans are falling deeper into debt as inflation continues to boost costs.  I’ve spoken to people who are using their credit cards to buy gasoline or food. It’s a bad idea but they need to eat and drive to work.  

At our church, we have a pantry that feeds many people and many are also calling with requests for money to pay the rent.  Thankfully, the parishioners keep the pantry full of food for the needy but the rent requests are tough to meet.

That’s the way it is in the summer of 2022. They may not call it a recession but these technicalities matter little to people asking for help. And more and more are asking for help.

P.S.  You can listen to my show  (My new American Thinker post)

Uvalde and climate change, courtesy of the one and only Al Gore

At some point, the serious people in the climate change debate need to take time out and regroup. It’s one thing to point out some facts about the climate changing.  I can listen and deal with that. It’s quite another for former VP Gore to bring up Uvalde. This is from Fox News:    

Former Vice President Al Gore made a stunning comparison, saying climate change skeptics are similar to the law enforcement officers who botched the response to the mass school shooting in Uvalde, Texas.

“Climate deniers are really in some ways similar to all of those almost 400 law enforcement officers in Uvalde, Texas, who were waiting outside an unlocked door while the children were being massacred,” Gore said during a pre-taped “Meet the Press” interview airing Sunday.

“They heard the screams, they heard the gunshots, and nobody stepped forward,” he continued. “And God bless those families who suffered so much. Law enforcement officials tell us that’s not typical of what law enforcement usually does.”

God bless America that this man did not carry his home state of Tennessee and win the presidency. The state slogan is “”Tennessee — America at its best.”  Our friends in Tennessee were at their best the first Tuesday of November 2000.

I wonder how the families of these kids feel about an irresponsible comment like this?  Yes, there were serious mistakes that day, from unlocked doors to careless parents to terrible execution by police officers. But why bring climate change into this?  I did not see the Meet the Press interview but did Mr. Todd challenge this outrageous statement.?

Like the abortion crowd, who get more hysterical by the minute, the climate change brigade needs to get away from opportunists like Al Gore and start talking sensibly.

P.S,  Check out  my videos  and posts. (My new American Thinker post)

The ‘kitchen debate’ of 1959

By the summer of 1959, VP Nixon was probably looking ahead to the 1960 presidential election. On the other hand, Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev was trying to prove to the Kremlin that he could stand up to the US. They both got their chance on this day in 1959, or the famous kitchen debates.

Who won?  They probably both did.  This is a portion of the conversation, because it was not really a debate:

Nixon: “I want to show you this kitchen. It is like those of our houses in California.”

Khrushchev: “We have such things.”

Nixon: “This is our newest model. This is the kind which is built in thousands of units for direct installations in the houses. In America, we like to make life easier for women…”

Khrushchev: “Your capitalistic attitude toward women does not occur under communism.”

Nixon: “I think that this attitude towards women is universal. What we want to do, is make life more easy for our housewives. … This house can be bought for $14,000 and most American [veterans from World War II] can buy a home in the bracket of $10,000 to $15,000. Let me give you an example that you can appreciate. Our steel workers, as you know, are now on strike. But any steelworker could buy this house. They earn $3 an hour. This house costs about $100 a month to buy on a contract running 25 to 30 years.”

Khrushchev: “We have steel workers and peasants who can afford to spend $14,000 for a house. Your American houses are built to last only 20 years so builders could sell new houses at the end. We build firmly. We build for our children and grandchildren.”

Nixon: “American houses last for more than 20 years, but, even so, after 20 years many Americans want a new house or a new kitchen. Their kitchen is obsolete by that time. … The American system is designed to take advantage of new inventions and new techniques.”

Khrushchev: “This theory does not hold water. Some things never get out of date — houses, for instance, and furniture.  Furnishings, perhaps — but not houses. I have read much about America and American houses, and I do not think that this exhibit and what you say is strictly accurate.”

Nixon: “Well, umm…”

Khrushchev: “I hope I have not insulted you.”

Nixon: “I have been insulted by experts. Everything we say [on the other hand] is in good humor. Always speak frankly.”

It went on a bit longer, and on TV, to say the least.  The comments about women are interesting so many years later.  Both men got their shots, but the Soviet leader never got to see Disneyland.  Mr. Khrushchev was barred from pre-woke Disneyland, and he was furious.

What’s amazing is that Cuba and Vietnam were not brought up, or at least I could not find any evidence that they were.  In other words, the issue that almost started a nuclear war and the war that divided the U.S. were not on the agenda.  Maybe neither man thought they were important.

PS: Check out my videos and posts. (My new American Thinker post)

The left destroys everything it touches, and now it’s destroying the US Armed Forces

They destroy everything that they touch, from Disney movies to works of literature to historical statues to Cuba to now the U.S. armed forces.  I’m talking about “the wokies” who are bent on destroying the country and culture that they hate so much.

The latest is the armed forces, as Glenn Reynolds wrote:  

The Army’s No. 2 officer told Congress Tuesday that the service has no choice but to reduce total force strength by 10,000 for the fiscal year starting in September, with the next year looking even bleaker: By the end of fiscal 2023, it could be up to 28,000 soldiers short of its 476,000-troop target. Army Secretary Christine Wormuth’s spokeswoman said it’s met only half of its recruiting goal so far this fiscal year — with just 2½ months left.

Why is this? There are several potential explanations. One is that the new “woke” Army isn’t all that appealing to the kinds of people who traditionally join the military. 

Yes, wokism is bringing down another symbol of U.S. history. After 9/11 and the war on terror that included Iraq, young men ran to sign up. They were inspired to defend the country they love. They wanted to do their part as their fathers and grandfathers and great grandfather had done before. They saw those photos of the last generation wearing the country’s colors and they wanted to be a part of it. So they went to places like Afghanistan and Iraq in much the same that their fathers and grandfathers went to Iwo Jima or the Mekong Delta.   

Then President Biden unleashed the wokies and now no one wants to sign up. They hear of “toxic masculinity” and “white rage” and every terrible thing that their country has done. Why sign up and risk your life?  They’re uninspired, and who can blame them?  This is not their dad’s military anymore, to recall the popular Olds commercial of years ago.   

The good news is that it will change. New leadership will return the armed forces to their place of honor. The bad news is that President Biden, or Harris, may have to bring back the draft to fight an unexpected war in one of those many places where our interests may be threatened.    

PS: Check out my videos and posts. (My new American Thinker post)

Never fear, Mayorkas is here

As someone who came here with my parents years ago, I’ve always been sympathetic to people who want to live here.  But it had better be orderly and legally, otherwise it’s chaos. We learned this week that the mayors of D.C. and New York City are not thrilled with illegal immigrants.  You say, aren’t these sanctuary cities run by woke Democrats?  Yes they are, but they are now claiming a lack of resources.  Gosh, I remember when saying that got you called a racist!

Of course, the problem is that the border is wide open.  It’s chaos down there — Border Patrol staff is overburdened and exhausted.  The men and women who work on the border were not hired to manage an open border but that’s what it is. Nevertheless, we hear from Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas that everything is cool, calm, and collected.  This is from Fox:   

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Tuesday claimed that the southern border “is secure” — even as Border Patrol agents are facing historic migrant numbers.

Mayorkas spoke at the Aspen Security Forum, where he was asked about the situation at the southern border — which has seen more than 200,000 migrant encounters a month in the last four months.

But, even though he acknowledged the situation is a “historic challenge,” the secretary claimed the border is “secure.”     

“Look, the border is secure,” he said. “We are working to make the border more secure. That has been a historic challenge.”

Secure?  Wonder how many Democrats believe that?  We  know that Democrats like Representative Henry Cuellar on the border don’t believe it at all. Not long ago I thought that Secretary Mayorkas was in over his head, another victim of Trump Derangement Syndrome bent on automatically reversing all the Trump policies that were actually working.   

Today, I raise my concern to level “dishonest.” Mayorkas cannot really believe what he is saying unless he is the secretary of another country without a border problem. Maybe there is another planet out there in the Milky Way where borders are open and everyone sings “Kumbaya.”

P.S.  Check out my videos and posts.

(My new American Thinker post)