“Que”? The models were wrong?

Over time, I’ve had an open mind about climate change.    In other words, I’ve always been open to evidence.

Instead, all I’ve ever  heard is hysteria about the end of the world or that we must expand the role of government.

And then there is the settled science defense.

But is it?

We learned today that the threat from climate change is not quite as severe as originally reported.

This is from The Telegraph:

Climate change poses less of an immediate threat to the planet than previously thought because scientists got their modelling wrong, a new study has found. New research by British scientists reveals the world is being polluted and warming up less quickly than 10-year-old forecasts predicted, giving countries more time to get a grip on their carbon output.

An unexpected “revolution” in affordable renewable energy has also contributed to the more positive outlook.

Experts now say there is a two-in-three chance of keeping global temperatures within 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial levels, the ultimate goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Wonder who is going to apologize for all of the alarmist predictions?

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.