Cuba today: Mucho turista NO mucha libertad

jm070915_color_cuba_tourism_dissidents

For quite some time, I’ve debated U.S.-Cuba relations and it went sort of like this:

The people who wanted an opening argued that Cubans would demand freedoms once they see and talk to U.S. tourists… it will infect Cuba with a desire for freedom and the regime won’t be able to stop it, or something like that. It’s the “flood Cuba with Americans and things will change” meme.

I would usually reply reminding the other side that the Castro regime would never allow these freedoms to flourish.

I would add that the Castro regime can’t.    The regime’s survival is tied to this repressive state.   It’s beyond ideology but rather to protect Castro Inc. or the family enterprise that has turned “dos socialistas” into a couple of very rich capitalist barons.

They say that Batista had a gold phone.   These two brothers own every phone in the island!

Well, it turns out that my hunch was right. President Obama’s opening brought dollars but the freedom index is not moving.

According to Havana Times, and other reports we’ve read in these pages, repression is up these days.  Dissidents are under fire.   We’ve seen the continuing harassment of “Las Damas” and others.

So what’s going on? The answer is nothing new, or certainly nothing that we have not seen before. The Fidel and Raul Castro regime have always turned on the repression machine whenever they fear that Cubans are thinking too much for themselves.

We saw this in the early 1980s right after Mariel embarrassed the regime, or when 100,000 Cubans left in a very short time.

We saw it in the 1996 when the Cuban Air Force shot down a plane flown by “Brothers to the rescue” looking for people in rafts. It was a message for Cubans leaving and for their relatives in Miami trying to help.

We saw it before Pope John Paul went to Cuba, as well as Pope Benedict and Pope Francis. In other words, the regime would always “clean up” the streets  of dissidents to avoid contact with foreign journalists covering the visits.

We are seeing it again now after President Trump changed course.

Let me add another point. It’s very likely that Raul Castro was invested in the predictions that Mrs. Clinton would win the election. Castro probably figured that a Clinton presidency would continue much of what President Obama had started.

So here we are. More tourists, more hotels and more visits by friendly New York Times reporters do not add up to freedom. We will have to wait for regime change, which is what we’ve been saying for years.

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk), (YouTube) and follow me on Twitter.