If you’re critical of Venezuela but silent on Cuba, you’re a hypocrite

Andres Oppenheimer in The Miami Herald:

Criticize Venezuela dictatorship but mum on Cuba? That’s political hypocrisy.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/andres-oppenheimer/2o9lhx/picture170268517/alternates/FREE_1140/Cuba%20Fidel%20Castro(2)

Latin American countries deserve credit for their recent denunciations of what they bluntly refer to as Venezuela’s dictatorship, but I have a hard time understanding why they don’t do the same thing with Cuba’s dictatorship. When it comes to Cuba, they all seem to look the other way.

I was thinking about this when I read about Cuba’s Oct. 22 election for municipal council members. It will be the first of several tightly controlled steps leading to the election of a National Assembly that is to decide the successor to Cuban President Raúl Castro, 86, who has vowed to step down in February 2018.

But, of course, Cuba’s National Assembly will just rubber-stamp whomever Castro picks. Cuba has been a hereditary dictatorship since 1959, when the late Cuban President Fidel Castro took power by force, and later when he became ill, he passed on the country’s government to his brother, Raúl, in 2006.

Now, Raúl is widely expected to hand the presidency either to his son, Col. Alejandro Castro Espin, or to Cuba’s current First Vice President Miguel Díaz-Canel. Either way, it will be Castro’s decision, with zero real input from the Cuban people.Only government supporters are allowed to participate in Cuban elections. Unlike Venezuela — which, for the sake of appearances, still tolerates opposition parties while often jailing their top leaders — Cuba is a one-party system, where only the Communist Party is legal.

Continue reading HERE.

1 thought on “If you’re critical of Venezuela but silent on Cuba, you’re a hypocrite”

  1. Yes, but there’s just one problem: being a hypocrite about Cuba has been the accepted norm for so long that nobody thinks twice about it (except for “those people,” who are essentially non-persons, so nobody cares). For instance, recently the cover story of The Economist was titled Venezuela in chaos–what the world should do. Is it even conceivable that any major mainstream publication would run a lead story titled Cuba in totalitarian hell–what the world should do? You get the idea.

Comments are closed.