Surprise! New York Times blames “embargo” for crash of Cubana Airlines flight

From our Bureau of Predictable Reporting

Yes, of course, this awful aviation accident in Havana can be blamed on the U.S. embargo.

Castro, Inc. has to fly old unreliable airplanes because it doesn’t have access to the financing that would allow them to buy newer ones.

Oh, sure, the NYT also mentions that  some analysts blame “mismanagement” of the Castro economy for the sad state of Cubana’s fleet, but the embargo gets most of the attention.

Santa Mierda de los perros de San Lazaro!

So utterly predictable…. see for yourself…. from the one and only Granma North, a.k.a. El Niuyortain:

Almost 40 years old by the time it crashed on Friday just outside of Havana, killing more than 100 people, the aging Boeing 737 had changed ownership nearly a half-dozen times, passing from operators in the United States to Canada, from Cameroon to the Caribbean.

“I actually flew that exact plane,” said John Cox, the head of the consultancy Safety Operating Systems, who traced the aircraft’s ownership back to 1979, when it was new and belonged to Piedmont Airlines, his former employer.

Though the cause of the crash has not been determined, the plane itself is a powerful symbol of Cuba’s troubled aviation industry. As tourism to the island surges, Cuba’s national airline finds itself struggling to acquire enough planes to meet the demand and maintain its decrepit fleet.

Cuba’s economy has long been in shambles, and experts say the troubles plaguing its aviation sector stem from the same obstacles that have bedeviled the country for decades: economic mismanagement and the United States embargo of the island.

Cuba’s problems have gotten so bad that, a few weeks ago, the country grounded most of its domestic flights because of safety concerns over its fleet. To continue flying, officials have been forced to lease planes from foreign outfits that sometimes use decades-old planes, like the one that crashed and burned right after takeoff on Friday, killing nearly everyone on board.

The old Boeing 737 had been leased to Cubana de Aviación, the state airline, by a relatively unknown Mexican company with just three aircraft in its fleet. Some aviation industry analysts were taken aback at the plane’s advanced age.

“That’s one of the oldest passenger jets I have heard of that is still in service,” said Richard Aboulafia, vice president of the Teal Group, an aviation and aerospace consulting company in Fairfax, Va.

Though Mexican officials said the plane had passed safety inspections as recently as November, it is one of just 100 of its model still in circulation across the globe, reflecting the limited options the Cuban government has in order to continue operating its state airline.

“Whether the airline is going to survive is an open question,” said George Farinas, a retired Delta pilot who works as a civil aviation inspector and is writing a book about the history of Cubana de Aviación. “They are in a major crisis right now.”..

… Analysts sometimes disagree about which is more to blame for Cuba’s troubled aviation industry: the American embargo of the island or the country’s own history of economic mismanagement.

Some experts say the sanctions have crippled the nation’s ability to gain access to the vendors and financing needed to get new aircraft. The Cubans themselves have made the case numerous times, blaming the decades-old sanctions for their aging planes, which include Russian-made aircraft that are difficult to find parts for.

If it were not for the embargo, they would be able to access a robust capital market for financing Western aircraft,” said Samuel Engel, the senior vice president at ICF Consulting and an expert in the international airline industry.

But many analysts say that, while a process is involved, Cuba can indeed get access to such markets, as well as planes.

The embargo does play a role in inhibiting business with Cuba, but there are policies to promote the sale of aircraft,” said Dallas Woodrum, an associate at Akin Gump in the firm’s Washington office. “Whether businesses decide to take advantage of that is a different question, and a matter of their risk tolerance and what type of reward they see.”

Continue reading HERE

5 thoughts on “Surprise! New York Times blames “embargo” for crash of Cubana Airlines flight”

  1. I knew the Big Bad U.S. Wolf would wind up being blamed for this, but I miscalculated. I thought Castro, Inc. would do it, but it doesn’t even need to justify itself–it has outside collaborators quite willing to do the deed. In this case, it is the same entity which did such favors for Stalin’s USSR in the 1930s and is still at it.

    The New York Times is worse than corrupted and perverse, because it projects itself as not only top-notch but righteous journalism, and plenty of people buy that or can use it to support their own perversity. It is like a cult leader who promotes pedophilia as good for children and gets people to believe and accept that, not to mention enabling pedophiles. Lord, the revulsion.

    May the fate of the NYT be commensurate with the fate it has done so much for so long to inflict on Cuba.

  2. We wonder why it’s called fake news. The New York Times reliably gives us the evidence.
    Yeah, the embargo caused the plane crash, just like Trump’s moving our Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem caused those deaths, er murders by Israelis, in Gaza.

  3. By the way, apparently the reason the little Colombian asswipe Ernesto Londoño isn’t covering this story is that he was made the head of the NYT’s Brazil bureau in 2017 and now oversees coverage of Brazil and the southern cone of “Latin” America. But of course, it doesn’t matter who the specific tool may be; the Times always finds suitable tools to do its dirty work, and its voice is always the same.

  4. Not suprised at all that the New York Times that used to vociferously support the South African and Haitian embargo would AGAIN gratuitously attack the Cuban embargo. Is this the 10,000th or 10,001st time? It seems that any time Cuba is mentioned, they have to digress and attack the embargo. It doesn’t matter what the topic is, they will bring in the embargo. It’s really quite alarming, and demonstrates how genuinely evil this rag is. For despite its sophisticated and highbrow reputation, its nothing more than a rag that undermines the tenet of journalistic integrity which is what sets a great paper apart from the rest.

Comments are closed.